public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com>, Andy Honig <ahonig@google.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, kaslr: randomize module base load address
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 13:09:52 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5307C0A0.9010708@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jLGBJp7oKXjausV70bXF-RTVDXxdZriS0cJ7X6NO90Ybg@mail.gmail.com>

On 02/21/2014 01:05 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> 
> I've been slapped down for adding more config options in the past, and
> I think it's unlikely that people using CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE won't
> want the modules base randomized too. I think this is a safe default,
> but if you see it as a requirement, I can change it.
> 

No, but I could totally see people wanting to randomize modules but not
the main kernel.  Why?  Because module addresses are already dynamic, so
there is no breakage.  Whether or not it is *useful* is another matter.

	-hpa


  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-21 21:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-21 20:21 [PATCH] x86, kaslr: randomize module base load address Kees Cook
2014-02-21 20:36 ` Andrew Morton
2014-02-21 21:05   ` Kees Cook
2014-02-21 21:09     ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2014-02-21 21:15     ` Andrew Morton
2014-02-21 21:18       ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-21 21:27         ` Andrew Morton
2014-02-21 23:01           ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-21 21:21       ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5307C0A0.9010708@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=ahonig@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wujianguo@huawei.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox