public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] usb: don't use PREPARE_DELAYED_WORK
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 10:20:43 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5308C04B.3050205@hurleysoftware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1402221002440.24585-100000@netrider.rowland.org>

On 02/22/2014 10:14 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Feb 2014, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> If this is actually safe, let's do it from the get-go.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> ------- 8< -------
>> PREPARE_[DELAYED_]WORK() are being phased out.  They have few users
>> and a nasty surprise in terms of reentrancy guarantee as workqueue
>> considers work items to be different if they don't have the same work
>> function.
>>
>> usb_hub->init_work is multiplexed with multiple work functions;
>> however, the work item is never queued while in-flight, so we can
>> simply use INIT_DELAYED_WORK() before each queueing.
>>
>> It would probably be best to route this with other related updates
>> through the workqueue tree.
>>
>> Lightly tested.
>>
>> v2: Greg and Alan confirm that the work item is never queued while
>>      in-flight.  Simply use INIT_DELAYED_WORK().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
>> Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>>   drivers/usb/core/hub.c |    4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
>> @@ -1040,7 +1040,7 @@ static void hub_activate(struct usb_hub
>>   		 */
>>   		if (type == HUB_INIT) {
>>   			delay = hub_power_on(hub, false);
>> -			PREPARE_DELAYED_WORK(&hub->init_work, hub_init_func2);
>> +			INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&hub->init_work, hub_init_func2);
>>   			schedule_delayed_work(&hub->init_work,
>>   					msecs_to_jiffies(delay));
>>
>> @@ -1194,7 +1194,7 @@ static void hub_activate(struct usb_hub
>>
>>   		/* Don't do a long sleep inside a workqueue routine */
>>   		if (type == HUB_INIT2) {
>> -			PREPARE_DELAYED_WORK(&hub->init_work, hub_init_func3);
>> +			INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&hub->init_work, hub_init_func3);
>>   			schedule_delayed_work(&hub->init_work,
>>   					msecs_to_jiffies(delay));
>>   			return;		/* Continues at init3: below */
>>
>
> This should work okay.  But while you're making these changes, you
> should remove the INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&hub->init_work, NULL) call in
> hub_probe().  It is now unnecessary.
>
> Is the cancel_delayed_work_sync(&hub->init_work) call in hub_quiesce()
> going to get confused by all this?
>
> It's worth mentioning that the only reason for the hub_init_func3 stuff
> is, as the comment says, to avoid a long sleep (100 ms) inside a work
> routine.

If a running hub init does not need to be single-threaded wrt
a different running hub init, then a single init work could be queued to
the system_unbound_wq which doesn't care about running times.

>  With all the changes to the work queue infrastructure, maybe
> this doesn't matter so much any more.  If we got rid of it then there
> wouldn't be any multiplexing, and this whole issue would become moot.



  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-22 15:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-20 20:44 [PATCHSET wq/for-3.15] workqueue: remove PREPARE_[DELAYED_]WORK() Tejun Heo
2014-02-20 20:44 ` [PATCH 1/9] wireless/rt2x00: don't use PREPARE_WORK in rt2800usb.c Tejun Heo
2014-03-07 15:26   ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-20 20:44 ` [PATCH 2/9] ps3-vuart: don't use PREPARE_WORK Tejun Heo
2014-02-21 23:19   ` Geoff Levand
2014-02-20 20:44 ` [PATCH 3/9] floppy: don't use PREPARE_[DELAYED_]WORK Tejun Heo
2014-02-21  9:37   ` Jiri Kosina
2014-02-20 20:44 ` [PATCH 4/9] firewire: don't use PREPARE_DELAYED_WORK Tejun Heo
2014-02-21  1:44   ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-21  1:59     ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-21  2:07       ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-21  2:13         ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-21  5:13           ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-21 10:03             ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-21 12:51               ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-21 13:06                 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-21 16:53                   ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-21 16:57                     ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-21 23:01                       ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-21 23:18                         ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-21 23:46                           ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-22 14:38                             ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-22 14:48                               ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-22 18:43                         ` James Bottomley
2014-02-22 18:48                           ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-22 18:52                             ` James Bottomley
2014-02-22 19:03                               ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-23  1:23                                 ` memory-barriers.txt again (was Re: [PATCH 4/9] firewire: don't use PREPARE_DELAYED_WORK) Stefan Richter
2014-02-23 16:37                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-23 20:35                                     ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-23 23:50                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-24  0:09                                         ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-24 16:26                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-24  0:32                                         ` Stefan Richter
2014-02-24 16:27                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-23 20:05                                 ` [PATCH 4/9] firewire: don't use PREPARE_DELAYED_WORK James Bottomley
2014-02-23 22:32                                   ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-21 20:45   ` Stefan Richter
2014-03-05 21:34     ` Stefan Richter
2014-03-07 15:18       ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-07 15:26   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2014-02-20 20:44 ` [PATCH 5/9] usb: " Tejun Heo
2014-02-20 20:59   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-02-21 15:06     ` Alan Stern
2014-02-21 15:07       ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-22 14:59   ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2014-02-22 15:14     ` Alan Stern
2014-02-22 15:20       ` Peter Hurley [this message]
2014-02-22 15:37       ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-22 23:03         ` Alan Stern
2014-02-23  4:29           ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-20 20:44 ` [PATCH 6/9] nvme: don't use PREPARE_WORK Tejun Heo
2014-03-07 15:26   ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-20 20:44 ` [PATCH 7/9] afs: " Tejun Heo
2014-02-20 22:00   ` David Howells
2014-02-20 22:46     ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-07 15:27   ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-20 20:44 ` [PATCH 8/9] staging/fwserial: " Tejun Heo
2014-02-21 15:13   ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-20 20:44 ` [PATCH 9/9] workqueue: remove PREPARE_[DELAYED_]WORK() Tejun Heo
2014-03-07 15:27   ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5308C04B.3050205@hurleysoftware.com \
    --to=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox