* mtip32xx blk-mq status?
@ 2014-02-26 19:29 Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-26 19:40 ` Asai Thambi S P
2014-02-26 21:10 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2014-02-26 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe, Sam Bradshaw, Asai Thambi S P; +Cc: linux-kernel
Hi all,
with blk-mq stabilizing in mainline and Jens using mtip32xx as tje major
example drivers in the past is there any progress on getting the
conversion finished and merged?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: mtip32xx blk-mq status?
2014-02-26 19:29 mtip32xx blk-mq status? Christoph Hellwig
@ 2014-02-26 19:40 ` Asai Thambi S P
2014-02-26 21:10 ` Jens Axboe
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Asai Thambi S P @ 2014-02-26 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: Jens Axboe, Sam Bradshaw, linux-kernel
On 2/26/2014 11:29 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> with blk-mq stabilizing in mainline and Jens using mtip32xx as tje major
> example drivers in the past is there any progress on getting the
> conversion finished and merged?
We are working on few changes in mtip32xx. After that, we will get to
blk-mq merge.
--
Regards,
Asai
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: mtip32xx blk-mq status?
2014-02-26 19:29 mtip32xx blk-mq status? Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-26 19:40 ` Asai Thambi S P
@ 2014-02-26 21:10 ` Jens Axboe
2014-02-27 4:42 ` Sam Bradshaw (sbradshaw)
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2014-02-26 21:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig, Sam Bradshaw, Asai Thambi S P; +Cc: linux-kernel
On 2014-02-26 11:29, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> with blk-mq stabilizing in mainline and Jens using mtip32xx as tje major
> example drivers in the past is there any progress on getting the
> conversion finished and merged?
I'll pick up the pieces as soon as I get back and can test again. The
basic conversion is easy enough, I'll just dust that off. On top of that
I started splitting the issue groups up, since it actually gets you a
good step further than just the basic conversion.
The only problem area I ran into was the special case of the unaligned
writes.
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: mtip32xx blk-mq status?
2014-02-26 21:10 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2014-02-27 4:42 ` Sam Bradshaw (sbradshaw)
2014-02-27 5:07 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sam Bradshaw (sbradshaw) @ 2014-02-27 4:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig,
Asai Thambi Samymuthu Pattrayasamy (asamymuthupa)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> On 2014-02-26 11:29, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > with blk-mq stabilizing in mainline and Jens using mtip32xx as tje
> major
> > example drivers in the past is there any progress on getting the
> > conversion finished and merged?
>
> I'll pick up the pieces as soon as I get back and can test again. The
> basic conversion is easy enough, I'll just dust that off. On top of
> that
> I started splitting the issue groups up, since it actually gets you a
> good step further than just the basic conversion.
If you have a public branch for the latter, send it our way. We can
help with the SRSI testing.
> The only problem area I ran into was the special case of the unaligned
> writes.
Yup, it's a painful limitation. If you need any p420m hardware, let me
know.
-Sam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: mtip32xx blk-mq status?
2014-02-27 4:42 ` Sam Bradshaw (sbradshaw)
@ 2014-02-27 5:07 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2014-02-27 5:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sam Bradshaw (sbradshaw), Christoph Hellwig,
Asai Thambi Samymuthu Pattrayasamy (asamymuthupa)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
On 2014-02-26 20:42, Sam Bradshaw (sbradshaw) wrote:
>
>> On 2014-02-26 11:29, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> with blk-mq stabilizing in mainline and Jens using mtip32xx as tje
>> major
>>> example drivers in the past is there any progress on getting the
>>> conversion finished and merged?
>>
>> I'll pick up the pieces as soon as I get back and can test again. The
>> basic conversion is easy enough, I'll just dust that off. On top of
>> that
>> I started splitting the issue groups up, since it actually gets you a
>> good step further than just the basic conversion.
>
> If you have a public branch for the latter, send it our way. We can
> help with the SRSI testing.
Thanks, I'll get it setup next week.
>> The only problem area I ran into was the special case of the unaligned
>> writes.
>
> Yup, it's a painful limitation. If you need any p420m hardware, let me
> know.
Sure, a card for testing is always useful.
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-02-27 5:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-02-26 19:29 mtip32xx blk-mq status? Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-26 19:40 ` Asai Thambi S P
2014-02-26 21:10 ` Jens Axboe
2014-02-27 4:42 ` Sam Bradshaw (sbradshaw)
2014-02-27 5:07 ` Jens Axboe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox