From: xiakaixu <xiakaixu@huawei.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>, <paulus@samba.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<acme@ghostprotocols.net>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Huxinwei <huxinwei@huawei.com>, Genghui <hui.geng@huawei.com>,
<peifeiyue@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: A Bug Inquiry in linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:53:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <530EA8B3.5080205@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lhwyuwpy.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Hi Namhyung,
于 2014/2/26 16:03, Namhyung Kim 写道:
> Hi xiakaixu,
>
>> 于 2014/2/19 9:48, xiakaixu 写道:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> There is a bug found in my work when running "perf record". The basic information
>>> is here. As we know, perf record is a parent process and the programme traced is
>>> a child process when running "perf record". Sometimes the child process become
>>> zombie state and disappear until the parent process is killed. The bug stays in linux/
>>> tools/perf/builtin-record.c.
>>> *********************************************************************
>>> static int __cmd_record(struct perf_record *rec, int argc, const char **argv)
>>> ......
>>> if (hits == rec->samples) {
>>> if (done)
>>> break;
>>> err = poll(evsel_list->pollfd, evsel_list->nr_fds, -1);
>>> waking++;
>>> }
>>> ......
>>> *********************************************************************
>>> The parent process still call the function
>>> poll(evsel_list->pollfd, evsel_list->nr_fds, -1) when the child process has exited
>>> already, which caused a zombie process.
>>>
>>> May I have your opinion ?
>>> Waiting for your reply!
>
> Do you have a real bug report based on this?
yeah, of course we have it, I'll be glad to provide it if necessary.
>
> AFAIK perf record installed a signal handler for SIGCHLD so it'll set
> the 'done' variable when child exits and then break the loop.
yes, you are right. Though the 'done' varible will be set when child exits,
there is time gap between "if(done)" statement and "poll(...)" function.
The 'done' variable won't be judge when child exits in this time gap.
You know this time gap is instruction level, so this bug is small probability.
My solution is adding a while(...) statement outside poll(...) function.
>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-27 2:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-19 1:48 A Bug Inquiry in linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c xiakaixu
2014-02-25 7:16 ` xiakaixu
2014-02-26 8:03 ` Namhyung Kim
2014-02-27 2:53 ` xiakaixu [this message]
2014-03-03 4:10 ` xiakaixu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=530EA8B3.5080205@huawei.com \
--to=xiakaixu@huawei.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=hui.geng@huawei.com \
--cc=huxinwei@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peifeiyue@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox