From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: add support for MSI message groups
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:40:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <530F6A96.2030508@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <530F68BE.2070505@oracle.com>
On 27/02/14 17:33, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 02/27/2014 10:45 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>>
>>> @@ -291,7 +290,10 @@ static int xen_initdom_setup_msi_irqs(struct
>>> pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
>>> (pci_domain_nr(dev->bus) << 16);
>>> map_irq.devfn = dev->devfn;
>>> - if (type == PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX) {
>>> + if (type == PCI_CAP_ID_MSI && nvec > 1) {
>>> + map_irq.type = MAP_PIRQ_TYPE_MULTI_MSI;
>>> + map_irq.entry_nr = nvec;
>>>
>>> Are we overloading entry_nr here with a different meaning? I thought it
>>> was meant to be entry number (in MSI-X table for example), not number of
>>> entries.
>> In the case of MSI message groups (MAP_PIRQ_TYPE_MULTI_MSI) entry_nr is
>> the number of vectors to setup, so yes, it's an overloading of entry_nr.
>
> Then I think we should at least make a note of this in physdev.h. (Or
> maybe even make entry_nr a union with nvec or some such, although that
> would look rather hacky).
OK, I can add a comment to that effect in physdev.h.
>
>> ....
>>
>>>
>>> index 42721d1..eb13326d 100644
>>> --- a/include/xen/interface/physdev.h
>>> +++ b/include/xen/interface/physdev.h
>>> @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ struct physdev_irq {
>>> #define MAP_PIRQ_TYPE_GSI 0x1
>>> #define MAP_PIRQ_TYPE_UNKNOWN 0x2
>>> #define MAP_PIRQ_TYPE_MSI_SEG 0x3
>>> +#define MAP_PIRQ_TYPE_MULTI_MSI 0x4
>>> Formatting.
>> I don't get the formatting problem, it's the same formatting that the
>> other MAP_PIRQ_TYPE_* use, and if the patch is applied formatting is OK.
>>
>
> That's because my client messed up whitespaces. You can look for example
> at https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/26/352 to see the extra tab.
It looks like an extra tab because there's a "+" in front of the line,
which makes the tab jump. If you remove the extra "+" and the spaces in
front of the preceding lines it is going to be aligned.
Roger.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-27 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-26 16:24 [PATCH] xen: add support for MSI message groups Roger Pau Monne
2014-02-27 12:42 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-02-27 14:55 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-02-27 15:45 ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-02-27 16:33 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-02-27 16:40 ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2014-02-27 18:15 ` [PATCH v2] " Roger Pau Monne
2014-02-27 18:45 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-02-28 17:20 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-02-28 17:46 ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-02-28 18:00 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-02-28 18:10 ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-02-28 18:36 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-02-28 19:41 ` David Vrabel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=530F6A96.2030508@citrix.com \
--to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox