From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] drm/bridge: adv7511: Re-write the i2c address as it may have been lost
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 01:36:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5310723.io2gjIHX6R@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1484608611-10956-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org>
Hi John,
Thank you for the patch.
On Monday 16 Jan 2017 15:16:51 John Stultz wrote:
> Laurent: Would something like the following be preferred? Seems
> to work as well for me..
That looks good to me. Feel free to still de-duplicate the power on/off code
if you want (but of course without adding the regcache_sync to the common
power on function this time).
Please see below for an additional comment.
> I've found that by just turning the chip on and off via the
> POWER_DOWN register, I end up getting i2c_transfer errors on
> HiKey.
>
> Investigating further, it seems some of the register state in
> the regmap cache is somehow getting lost, likely as the device
> registers were reset during power off.
>
> Thus this patch simply re-writes the i2c address to the
> ADV7511_REG_EDID_I2C_ADDR register to ensure its properly set
> before we try to read the EDID data.
>
> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
> Cc: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c index 405e460..32c59cb
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c
> @@ -567,6 +567,8 @@ static int adv7511_get_modes(struct adv7511 *adv7511,
>
> /* Reading the EDID only works if the device is powered */
> if (!adv7511->powered) {
> + unsigned int edid_i2c_addr = (adv7511->i2c_main->addr << 1) +
4;
> +
> regmap_update_bits(adv7511->regmap, ADV7511_REG_POWER,
> ADV7511_POWER_POWER_DOWN, 0);
> if (adv7511->i2c_main->irq) {
> @@ -576,6 +578,9 @@ static int adv7511_get_modes(struct adv7511 *adv7511,
> ADV7511_INT1_DDC_ERROR);
> }
> adv7511->current_edid_segment = -1;
> +
> + /* Reset the EDID_I2C_ADDR register as it may have been
cleared */
> + regmap_write(adv7511->regmap, ADV7511_REG_EDID_I2C_ADDR,
edid_i2c_addr);
As powering the device off called regcache_mark_dirty(), this will perform an
I2C write and cache the value. If we then try to read the EDID a second time
without going through a full power on/off sequence, I believe that regmap will
skip the write the second time, as the cache will contain the same value and
won't be marked as dirty. Should we call regcache_mark_dirty() when powering
the device down further down this function ?
> }
>
> edid = drm_do_get_edid(connector, adv7511_get_edid_block, adv7511);
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-16 23:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-03 19:41 [PATCH 0/5 v3] adv7511 EDID probing improvements John Stultz
2017-01-03 19:41 ` [PATCH 1/5 v3] drm/bridge: adv7511: Use work_struct to defer hotplug handing to out of irq context John Stultz
2017-01-03 19:41 ` [PATCH 2/5 v3] drm/bridge: adv7511: Switch to using drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event() John Stultz
2017-01-16 15:47 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-01-16 15:56 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-01-16 19:31 ` John Stultz
2017-01-03 19:41 ` [PATCH 3/5 v3] drm/bridge: adv7511: Enable HPD interrupts to support hotplug and improve monitor detection John Stultz
2017-01-03 19:41 ` [PATCH 4/5 v3] drm/bridge: adv7511: Rework adv7511_power_on/off() so they can be reused internally John Stultz
2017-01-16 15:50 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-01-03 19:41 ` [PATCH 5/5 v3] drm/bridge: adv7511: Reuse __adv7511_power_on/off() when probing EDID John Stultz
2017-01-16 16:03 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-01-16 20:14 ` John Stultz
2017-01-16 22:25 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-01-16 23:16 ` [RFC][PATCH] drm/bridge: adv7511: Re-write the i2c address as it may have been lost John Stultz
2017-01-16 23:36 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2017-01-16 23:39 ` John Stultz
2017-01-11 8:48 ` [PATCH 0/5 v3] adv7511 EDID probing improvements Archit Taneja
2017-01-12 0:06 ` John Stultz
2017-01-12 4:22 ` Archit Taneja
2017-01-16 15:57 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5310723.io2gjIHX6R@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=architt@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox