From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755367AbaCCWPq (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Mar 2014 17:15:46 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:4626 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753996AbaCCWPo (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Mar 2014 17:15:44 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,580,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="465937362" Message-ID: <5314FEF3.70908@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 06:15:15 +0800 From: "Li, Aubrey" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "David E. Box" CC: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/2] x86: IOSF: Add loadable module support References: <1393609674-2999-1-git-send-email-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> <1393641652-7222-1-git-send-email-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> <531428D9.1060101@linux.intel.com> <20140303155850.GA2879@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20140303155850.GA2879@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2014/3/3 23:58, David E. Box wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 03:01:45PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote: >> Hi David, >> >> I'm probably too late to catch this thread. Just one question, what's >> the relationship between >> arch/x86/kernel/iosf_mbi.c >> and >> drivers/platform/x86/intel_baytrail.c >> > iosf_mbi.c is the version that went upstream, no longer specific to baytrail. Then should we remove the latter? Thanks, -Aubrey > > david box > >