public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: yogesh <mr.yogesh@gmail.com>, Levente Kurusa <levex@linux.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Add documentation for proper usage and order of preference of calls to print diagnostic messages.
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 08:27:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5315FF0F.9000207@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140304143111.GA4074@yogesh-Dell-System-XPS-L502X>

On 03/04/2014 06:31 AM, yogesh wrote:
> This patch adds documentation that clarifies the use of various
> diagnostic printing messages. It shows the preference of subsystem_dbg
> calls to dev_dbg (whenever possible), as they first preferred format of
> logging debug messages.
> Signed-off-by: Yogesh Chaudhari <mr.yogesh@gmail.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/CodingStyle | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/CodingStyle b/Documentation/CodingStyle
> index 7fe0546..083f738 100644
> --- a/Documentation/CodingStyle
> +++ b/Documentation/CodingStyle
> @@ -662,6 +662,23 @@ and driver, and are tagged with the right level:  dev_err(), dev_warn(),
>  dev_info(), and so forth.  For messages that aren't associated with a
>  particular device, <linux/printk.h> defines pr_debug() and pr_info().
>  
> +If the subsystem has its own diagnostic macros then they should be used
> +instead of dev_dbg calls.
> +e.g. If you are using network subsystem, use netdev_dbg;

   E.g., if you are

> +if you are using V4L, use v4l_dbg etc.
> +This standardises the output format in every subsystem.
> +
> +Depending on your changes, the following order of precedence
> +applies to printing messages:
> +1. [subsystem]_dbg() is preferred when the subsystem has its own
> +diagnostic macros.
> +2. dev_dbg() is preferred when you have a generic struct device object.
> +3. pr_debug() should be used when 1 and 2 above are not applicable.
> +4. printk() should be avoided.
> +
> +Note: The above order applies to diagnostic calls of all log levels viz:
> +*_emerg, *_alert, *_crit, *_err, *_warn, *_notice, *_info and *_dbg.
> +
>  Coming up with good debugging messages can be quite a challenge; and once
>  you have them, they can be a huge help for remote troubleshooting.  Such
>  messages should be compiled out when the DEBUG symbol is not defined (that
> --


-- 
~Randy

      parent reply	other threads:[~2014-03-04 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-04 11:48 [PATCH 1/1] Add documentation for proper usage and order of preference of calls to print diagnostic messages yogesh
2014-03-04 13:39 ` Levente Kurusa
2014-03-04 14:31   ` yogesh
2014-03-04 14:50     ` Levente Kurusa
2014-03-04 16:27     ` Randy Dunlap [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5315FF0F.9000207@infradead.org \
    --to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=levex@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mr.yogesh@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox