From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755039AbaCDQyB (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2014 11:54:01 -0500 Received: from am1ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com ([213.199.154.207]:10935 "EHLO am1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754018AbaCDQyA (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2014 11:54:00 -0500 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:165.204.84.222;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:atltwp02.amd.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -4 X-BigFish: VPS-4(z579ehzbb2dI98dI9371I1432Izz1f42h2148h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h2146h1202h1e76h2189h1d1ah1d2ah21bch1fc6hzz1de098h8275bh1de097hz2dh839h947hd25he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h1765h18e1h190ch1946h19b4h19c3h1ad9h1b0ah2222h224fh1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dfeh1dffh1f5fh1fe8h1ff5h209eh22d0h2336h2438h2461h2487h24d7h2516h2545h255eh25cch1155h) X-WSS-ID: 0N1X89P-08-CCX-02 X-M-MSG: Message-ID: <5316051E.2030004@amd.com> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 10:53:50 -0600 From: Suravee Suthikulpanit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joerg Roedel CC: , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jay Cornwall , "Naru, Kim" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/amd: Fix PASID format in INVALIDATE_IOTLB_PAGES command References: <1393451371-17894-1-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> <20140304141251.GB2799@8bytes.org> In-Reply-To: <20140304141251.GB2799@8bytes.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginatorOrg: amd.com X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/4/2014 8:12 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 03:49:31PM -0600, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com wrote: >> From: Jay Cornwall >> >> This patch corrects the PASID format in the INVALIDATE_IOTLB_PAGES >> command, which was caused by incorrect information in >> the AMD IOMMU Architectural Specification v2.01 document. >> >> Incorrect format: >> cmd->data[0][16:23] = PASID[7:0] >> cmd->data[1][16:27] = PASID[19:8] >> >> Correct format: >> cmd->data[0][16:23] = PASID[15:8] >> cmd->data[1][16:23] = PASID[7:0] >> >> However, this does not affect the IOMMUv2 hardware implementation, >> and has been corrected since version 2.02 of the specification >> (available through AMD NDA). >> >> Signed-off-by: Jay Cornwall >> Reviewed-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit > > Applied, thanks. > > Does this mean that PASIDs are only 16 bits wide now from the former 20 > bits? > > > Thank you Joerg. The specification also state that this command format does not support the maximum size of the PASID field. However, other commands seem to still support 20-bit PASID. Suravee