From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752960AbaCGJwK (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Mar 2014 04:52:10 -0500 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:35290 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752673AbaCGJwD (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Mar 2014 04:52:03 -0500 Message-ID: <531996BB.2050401@linutronix.de> Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 10:51:55 +0100 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users CC: Thomas Gleixner , Carsten Emde , John Kacur , Paul Gortmaker , stable-rt@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 3/6] rt: Make cpu_chill() use hrtimer instead of msleep() References: <20140305003333.402759240@goodmis.org> <20140305003346.602499217@goodmis.org> In-Reply-To: <20140305003346.602499217@goodmis.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/05/2014 01:33 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > 3.2.55-rt79-rc1 stable review patch. > If anyone has any objections, please let me know. Now that you posted "cpu_chill: Add a UNINTERRUPTIBLE hrtimer_nanosleep" wouldn't it make sense to delay this patches from the stable series until we get them all in one go? Sebastian