public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Benjamin <bcrl@kvack.org>
Cc: Kent <kmo@daterainc.com>, Jens <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	miaox@cn.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] aio: simplify fetching ioctx_table pointer from, mm_struct
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 18:41:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5319A25C.6090308@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53106480.4020900@cn.fujitsu.com>

ping...

On 02/28/2014 06:27 PM, Gu Zheng wrote:

> Using rcu_dereference_protected() rather than the "rcu_read_lock-->
> rcu_dereference-->rcu_read_unlock" group to simplify fetching the
> ioctx_table pointer in ioctx_add_table and kill_ioctx, because it
> is protected by the ioctx_lock.
> And in the exit_aio(), there are no other users manipulating ioctx_table
> at this stage, so we can use rcu_access_pointer directly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  fs/aio.c |   42 ++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/aio.c b/fs/aio.c
> index 062a5f6..7eaa631 100644
> --- a/fs/aio.c
> +++ b/fs/aio.c
> @@ -544,8 +544,8 @@ static int ioctx_add_table(struct kioctx *ctx, struct mm_struct *mm)
>  	struct aio_ring *ring;
>  
>  	spin_lock(&mm->ioctx_lock);
> -	rcu_read_lock();
> -	table = rcu_dereference(mm->ioctx_table);
> +	table = rcu_dereference_protected(mm->ioctx_table,
> +					lockdep_is_held(&mm->ioctx_lock));
>  
>  	while (1) {
>  		if (table)
> @@ -553,7 +553,6 @@ static int ioctx_add_table(struct kioctx *ctx, struct mm_struct *mm)
>  				if (!table->table[i]) {
>  					ctx->id = i;
>  					table->table[i] = ctx;
> -					rcu_read_unlock();
>  					spin_unlock(&mm->ioctx_lock);
>  
>  					ring = kmap_atomic(ctx->ring_pages[0]);
> @@ -564,7 +563,6 @@ static int ioctx_add_table(struct kioctx *ctx, struct mm_struct *mm)
>  
>  		new_nr = (table ? table->nr : 1) * 4;
>  
> -		rcu_read_unlock();
>  		spin_unlock(&mm->ioctx_lock);
>  
>  		table = kzalloc(sizeof(*table) + sizeof(struct kioctx *) *
> @@ -575,8 +573,8 @@ static int ioctx_add_table(struct kioctx *ctx, struct mm_struct *mm)
>  		table->nr = new_nr;
>  
>  		spin_lock(&mm->ioctx_lock);
> -		rcu_read_lock();
> -		old = rcu_dereference(mm->ioctx_table);
> +		old = rcu_dereference_protected(mm->ioctx_table,
> +					lockdep_is_held(&mm->ioctx_lock));
>  
>  		if (!old) {
>  			rcu_assign_pointer(mm->ioctx_table, table);
> @@ -711,12 +709,11 @@ static void kill_ioctx(struct mm_struct *mm, struct kioctx *ctx)
>  		struct kioctx_table *table;
>  
>  		spin_lock(&mm->ioctx_lock);
> -		rcu_read_lock();
> -		table = rcu_dereference(mm->ioctx_table);
> +		table = rcu_dereference_protected(mm->ioctx_table,
> +					lockdep_is_held(&mm->ioctx_lock));
>  
>  		WARN_ON(ctx != table->table[ctx->id]);
>  		table->table[ctx->id] = NULL;
> -		rcu_read_unlock();
>  		spin_unlock(&mm->ioctx_lock);
>  
>  		/* percpu_ref_kill() will do the necessary call_rcu() */
> @@ -765,27 +762,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(wait_on_sync_kiocb);
>  void exit_aio(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>  	struct kioctx_table *table;
> -	struct kioctx *ctx;
>  	unsigned i = 0;
>  
> -	while (1) {
> -		rcu_read_lock();
> -		table = rcu_dereference(mm->ioctx_table);
> -
> -		do {
> -			if (!table || i >= table->nr) {
> -				rcu_read_unlock();
> -				rcu_assign_pointer(mm->ioctx_table, NULL);
> -				if (table)
> -					kfree(table);
> -				return;
> -			}
> -
> -			ctx = table->table[i++];
> -		} while (!ctx);
> +	table = rcu_access_pointer(mm->ioctx_table);
> +	if (!table)
> +		return;
>  
> -		rcu_read_unlock();
> +	while (i < table->nr) {
> +		struct kioctx *ctx = table->table[i++];
>  
> +		if (!ctx)
> +			continue;
>  		/*
>  		 * We don't need to bother with munmap() here -
>  		 * exit_mmap(mm) is coming and it'll unmap everything.
> @@ -798,6 +785,9 @@ void exit_aio(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  
>  		kill_ioctx(mm, ctx);
>  	}
> +
> +	rcu_assign_pointer(mm->ioctx_table, NULL);
> +	kfree(table);
>  }
>  
>  static void put_reqs_available(struct kioctx *ctx, unsigned nr)



  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-07 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-28 10:27 [RESEND PATCH 1/2] aio: simplify fetching ioctx_table pointer from, mm_struct Gu Zheng
2014-03-07 10:41 ` Gu Zheng [this message]
2014-03-07 12:40   ` Benjamin LaHaise

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5319A25C.6090308@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
    --cc=kmo@daterainc.com \
    --cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox