From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753958AbaCGQGR (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Mar 2014 11:06:17 -0500 Received: from ducie-dc1.codethink.co.uk ([185.25.241.215]:53029 "EHLO ducie-dc1.codethink.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753809AbaCGQGO (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Mar 2014 11:06:14 -0500 Message-ID: <5319EE73.7010305@codethink.co.uk> Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 16:06:11 +0000 From: Ben Dooks Organization: Codethink Limited. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131103 Icedove/17.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergei Shtylyov CC: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Guennadi Liakhovetski , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, magnus.damm@opensource.se, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@lists.codethink.co.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ARM: lager: add vin1 node References: <1394197299-17528-1-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> <1394197299-17528-3-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> <5319F8D1.5050608@cogentembedded.com> In-Reply-To: <5319F8D1.5050608@cogentembedded.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/03/14 16:50, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 03/07/2014 04:01 PM, Ben Dooks wrote: > >> Add device-tree for vin1 (composite video in) on the >> lager board. > >> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks > > This patch should have been preceded by the VIN driver patch and > bindings description, don't you think? > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts >> index a087421..7528cfc 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts > [...] >> @@ -239,8 +244,41 @@ >> status = "ok"; >> pinctrl-0 = <&i2c2_pins>; >> pinctrl-names = "default"; >> + >> + adv7180: adv7180@0x20 { > > ePAPR standard [1] tells us that: > > "The name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function > of the device and not its precise programming model." > > So, I would suggest something like "video-decoder" instead. And > remove "0x" from the address part of the node name please. Personally I'm not fussed about names in the tree. I will look at changing it to something like vin1_decoder -- Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/ Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius