public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com
Cc: f2fs <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] f2fs: optimize restore_node_summary slightly
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:38:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <531D4FE6.7000503@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394426742.3870.89.camel@kjgkr>

Hi Kim,
On 03/10/2014 12:45 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:

> Hi Gu,
> 
> 2014-03-07 (금), 18:43 +0800, Gu Zheng:
>> Previously, we ra_sum_pages to pre-read contiguous pages as more
>> as possible, and if we fail to alloc more pages, an ENOMEM error
>> will be reported upstream, even though we have alloced some pages
>> yet. In fact, we can use the available pages to do the job partly,
>> and continue the rest in the following circle. Only reporting ENOMEM
>> upstream if we really can not alloc any available page.
>>
>> And another fix is ignoring dealing with the following pages if an
>> EIO occurs when reading page from page_list.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/f2fs/node.c    |   44 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>>  fs/f2fs/segment.c |    7 +++++--
>>  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
>> index 8787469..4b7861d 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
>> @@ -1588,15 +1588,8 @@ static int ra_sum_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct list_head *pages,
>>  	for (; page_idx < start + nrpages; page_idx++) {
>>  		/* alloc temporal page for read node summary info*/
>>  		page = alloc_page(GFP_F2FS_ZERO);
>> -		if (!page) {
>> -			struct page *tmp;
>> -			list_for_each_entry_safe(page, tmp, pages, lru) {
>> -				list_del(&page->lru);
>> -				unlock_page(page);
>> -				__free_pages(page, 0);
>> -			}
>> -			return -ENOMEM;
>> -		}
>> +		if (!page)
>> +			break;
>>  
>>  		lock_page(page);
>>  		page->index = page_idx;
>> @@ -1607,7 +1600,8 @@ static int ra_sum_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct list_head *pages,
>>  		f2fs_submit_page_mbio(sbi, page, page->index, &fio);
>>  
>>  	f2fs_submit_merged_bio(sbi, META, READ);
>> -	return 0;
>> +
>> +	return page_idx - start;
>>  }
>>  
>>  int restore_node_summary(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>> @@ -1630,28 +1624,30 @@ int restore_node_summary(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>  		nrpages = min(last_offset - i, bio_blocks);
>>  
>>  		/* read ahead node pages */
>> -		err = ra_sum_pages(sbi, &page_list, addr, nrpages);
>> -		if (err)
>> -			return err;
>> +		nrpages = ra_sum_pages(sbi, &page_list, addr, nrpages);
>> +		if (!nrpages)
>> +			return -ENOMEM;
>>  
>>  		list_for_each_entry_safe(page, tmp, &page_list, lru) {
>> -
> 
> Here we can just add:
> 			if (err)
> 				goto skip;
> 			lock_page();
> 			...
> 			unlock_page();
> 		skip:
> 			list_del();
> 			__free_pages();
> 
> IMO, it's more neat, so if you have any objection, let me know.
> Otherwise, I'll handle this by myself. :)

Thanks very much.

Regards,
Gu

> Thanks,
> 
>> -			lock_page(page);
>> -			if (unlikely(!PageUptodate(page))) {
>> -				err = -EIO;
>> -			} else {
>> -				rn = F2FS_NODE(page);
>> -				sum_entry->nid = rn->footer.nid;
>> -				sum_entry->version = 0;
>> -				sum_entry->ofs_in_node = 0;
>> -				sum_entry++;
>> +			if (!err) {
>> +				lock_page(page);
>> +				if (unlikely(!PageUptodate(page))) {
>> +					err = -EIO;
>> +				} else {
>> +					rn = F2FS_NODE(page);
>> +					sum_entry->nid = rn->footer.nid;
>> +					sum_entry->version = 0;
>> +					sum_entry->ofs_in_node = 0;
>> +					sum_entry++;
>> +				}
>> +				unlock_page(page);
>>  			}
>>  
>>  			list_del(&page->lru);
>> -			unlock_page(page);
>>  			__free_pages(page, 0);
>>  		}
>>  	}
>> +
>>  	return err;
>>  }
>>  
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>> index 199c964..b3f8431 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>> @@ -1160,9 +1160,12 @@ static int read_normal_summaries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type)
>>  				ns->ofs_in_node = 0;
>>  			}
>>  		} else {
>> -			if (restore_node_summary(sbi, segno, sum)) {
>> +			int err;
>> +
>> +			err = restore_node_summary(sbi, segno, sum);
>> +			if (err) {
>>  				f2fs_put_page(new, 1);
>> -				return -EINVAL;
>> +				return err;
>>  			}
>>  		}
>>  	}
> 



      parent reply	other threads:[~2014-03-10  5:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-07 10:43 [PATCH 4/5] f2fs: optimize restore_node_summary slightly Gu Zheng
2014-03-10  4:45 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2014-03-10  5:13   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2014-03-10  5:37     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2014-03-10  6:12       ` Chao Yu
2014-03-10  5:38   ` Gu Zheng [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=531D4FE6.7000503@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox