From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755240AbaCKNLG (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Mar 2014 09:11:06 -0400 Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:51181 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752024AbaCKNLD (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Mar 2014 09:11:03 -0400 Message-ID: <531F0B49.2070008@ti.com> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:10:33 +0200 From: Roger Quadros User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lee Jones , CC: , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/9] USB Host support for OMAP5 uEVM References: <1393510711-4697-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <531ECDCB.4060700@ti.com> <20140311120259.GI21216@lee--X1> <531EFE97.1090202@ti.com> <20140311130715.GM21216@lee--X1> In-Reply-To: <20140311130715.GM21216@lee--X1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/11/2014 03:07 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > >>>>> This patchset brings up USB Host ports and Ethernet port on >>>>> the OMAP5 uEVM board. >>>>> >>>>> It also does some cleanup with respect to DT clock binding >>>>> for the mfd/omap-usb-host driver. >>>>> >>>>> Please queue these for -next. >>>>> >>>>> Lee, >>>>> >>>>> I've folded some platform data dependent patches with mfd patches >>>>> so that they don't break functionality when applied individually. >>>>> You can safely pull in all MFD patches (1 to 6). >>>>> >>>>> Tony & Benoit, >>>>> >>>>> Can you please accept patches 7, 8 and 9? >>>> >>>> Tony has already picked up 7,8 and 9 through omap-soc tree. >>>> >>>> Since you acked most patches except 5 and 6, are you fine if Tony takes >>>> all the patches 1 to 4 in this series via omap-soc tree? >>>> >>>> What about patches 5 and 6? >>> >>> Any patches which are orthogonal can just be sucked into whichever tree >>> they belong in. If there are inter-subsystem dependencies I'd prefer >>> to take them and issue a immutable branch pull-request to the other >>> maintainers. >>> >> Awesome. That would be great, thanks. > > That does mean I need a) all of the Maintainer Acks and b) you to tell > me which ones need to go through a single tree. > You need to take patches 1 to 6 in the MFD tree. Out of these, patches 1 to 4 need to be shared with Tony as an immutable branch. Tony, could you please Ack patches 1 to 4? Thanks. cheers, -roger