public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
To: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: is printk() safe within a timekeeper_seq write section?
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 12:29:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <531F6429.8050008@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140306174531.GA30634@midget.suse.cz>

On 03/06/2014 09:45 AM, Jiri Bohac wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking at the printk call in
> __timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(), introduced in cb5de2f8
> (time: Catch invalid timespec sleep values in __timekeeping_inject_sleeptime)
>
> Is it safe to call printk() while timekeeper_seq is held for
> writing?
>
> What about this call chain?
>   printk
>     vprintk_emit
>       console_unlock
>         up(&console_sem)
>           __up
> 	    wake_up_process
> 	      try_to_wake_up
> 	        ttwu_do_activate
> 		  ttwu_activate
> 		    activate_task
> 		      enqueue_task
> 		        enqueue_task_fair
> 			  hrtick_update
> 			    hrtick_start_fair
> 			      hrtick_start_fair
> 			        get_time
> 				  ktime_get
> 				    --> endless loop on
> 				    read_seqcount_retry(&timekeeper_seq, ...)
> 		  
>
> It looks like an unlikely but possible deadlock. 
> Or did I overlook something?

So I don't think I've seen anything like the above in my testing, but it
may just be very hard to get that path to trigger.

I was also surprised the seqlock lockdep enablement changes wouldn't
catch this, but Jiri pointed out printk calls lockdep_off in
vprintk_emit() - which makes sense as you don't want lockdep splats
calling printk and recursing - but is frustrating to have that hole in
the checking.

There's a few spots where we do printks with the timekeeping seqlock
held, and they're annoyingly nested far enough to make deferring the
printk awkward. So I'm half thinking we could have some sort of buffer
something like time_printk() could fill and then flush it after the lock
is dropped. Then we just need something to warn if any new printks' are
added to timekeeping seqlock sequences.

The whole thing makes my head spin a bit, since even if we remove the
explicit printks, I'm not sure where else printk might be triggered
(like via lockdep warnings, for instance), where it might be unsafe.

Peter/Thomas: Any thoughts on the deferred printk buffer? Does printk
already have something like this? Any other ideas here?

thanks
-john





  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-11 19:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-06 17:45 is printk() safe within a timekeeper_seq write section? Jiri Bohac
2014-03-11 19:29 ` John Stultz [this message]
2014-03-11 21:32   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-11 21:54     ` John Stultz
2014-03-12  6:49       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-12  9:21       ` Jiri Bohac
2014-03-28  0:49         ` John Stultz
2014-03-12  6:46     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-12 14:34       ` Jan Kara
2014-03-12 15:06         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-14 15:13           ` Jan Kara
2014-03-12 13:13     ` Jan Kara
2014-03-12  9:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-12  9:18 ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=531F6429.8050008@linaro.org \
    --to=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=jbohac@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox