From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Carlo Caione <carlo.caione@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irq: Add a new IRQF_ACK_BEFORE_UNMASK irq flagq
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 17:20:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5321DACD.6010303@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1403131442480.18573@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>
Hi,
On 03/13/2014 03:32 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> One side note: Since we need to specify IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED and
>> handle_fasteoi_late_irq() as the handler, would it be easily doable to use
>> the handle_fasteoi_irq() handler and skip the EOI in the threaded mode?
>> But if it creates a mess then leave it as it is.
>
> Yeah, I was looking into that already. Patch below.
>
> To resemble the late version you need to add IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED and
> IRQCHIP_EOI_IF_HANDLED to your irq chip.
Just gave this a review (in as far as I'm qualified to review core irq
code), looks good and I agree this is an improvement over the previous
version.
There is one behavioral change for irq-chips not setting the new
IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED flag hiding in there.
Before if the conditional unmask conditions were true for the
ONESHOT case the code would do: "unmask; eoi", now it does
"eoi; unmask" I believe the new behavior is more correct, but, since
it is a behavior change I thought I should point this out.
I've also given this a test-run on sun4i and it works as advertised.
FWIW, this patch is:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
I'll include this in v3 of my irq-sun4i patch-set as it is a dependency
there.
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-13 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-11 23:13 [PATCH] irq: Add a new IRQF_ACK_BEFORE_UNMASK irq flag Hans de Goede
2014-03-12 8:55 ` Hans de Goede
2014-03-12 10:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-12 10:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-03-12 10:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-12 17:08 ` Hans de Goede
2014-03-12 22:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-13 13:09 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2014-03-13 13:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-13 13:37 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2014-03-13 14:32 ` [PATCH] irq: Add a new IRQF_ACK_BEFORE_UNMASK irq flagq Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-13 16:20 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2014-03-13 16:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5321DACD.6010303@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=carlo.caione@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox