From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753374AbaCRCIp (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Mar 2014 22:08:45 -0400 Received: from mail-ig0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:43066 "EHLO mail-ig0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752902AbaCRCIn (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Mar 2014 22:08:43 -0400 Message-ID: <5327AAA8.2080703@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 22:08:40 -0400 From: Alexandre Demers Reply-To: alexandre.f.demers@gmail.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tejun Heo CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [Regression, bisected 9e30cc] "sysfs, kernfs: no need to kern_mount() sysfs from sysfs_init()" prevents system from booting correctly References: <20140314140804.GG12613@htj.dyndns.org> <20140317201346.GE17373@mtj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20140317201346.GE17373@mtj.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org By the way, I tried to get the error message, but my display had gone in standby mode before it completed and it wouldn't wake up. I'll have to test with an earlier 3.14 kernel (rc1 or rc2), when it was answering to my wake up signal. Even though my display doesn't wake up with rc6, it is still running since I can see some activities on my disk from time to time. I'll be back with more info ASAP. Alexandre Demers On Mon 17 Mar 2014 04:13:46 PM EDT, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:48:10AM -0400, Alexandre Demers wrote: >> Since it takes a while before the system begins to display errors, >> I'll have to test it and report it later today when I'll get back from >> work. > > Any update? > >> Now, about the userland part, this seems a broad question... I'm using >> Arch Linux 64bit (updated mostly on a daily basis). But I suspect you >> are expecting a narrower information. Is there anything in particular >> you want to know? > > I was just wondering whether you were running something really exotic. > Doesn't seem that way. Weird that other people aren't hitting this > issue. Hmm... > > Thanks. >