From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754990AbaCRKy5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Mar 2014 06:54:57 -0400 Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:58415 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753013AbaCRKyz (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Mar 2014 06:54:55 -0400 Message-ID: <532825D9.4050708@ti.com> Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:24:17 +0530 From: Sekhar Nori User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Holler , Linus Walleij CC: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com" , Grygorii Strashko , Alexandre Courbot , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Prabhakar Lad , Rob Herring , Grant Likely , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: davinci: fix gpio selection for OF References: <5316FFCE.1060603@ti.com> <1394018461-757-1-git-send-email-holler@ahsoftware.de> <5322D529.4070904@ahsoftware.de> <5326F8C5.5090406@ti.com> <532805AE.9000806@ti.com> <532815A8.9090807@ahsoftware.de> In-Reply-To: <532815A8.9090807@ahsoftware.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Alexander, On Tuesday 18 March 2014 03:15 PM, Alexander Holler wrote: > Am 18.03.2014 09:37, schrieb Sekhar Nori: > >> It is safe - at the least it does not break anything that is already >> working. I guess the decision to put it into -rc depends on whether you >> consider out of tree dtbs to be a valid usecase for the kernel. > > That's all DT is about, getting rid of the necessity for in-tree > hw-descriptions. ;) > > But I don't need any rush here, I'm just unable to understand why the > -rc phase isn't used for bug fixing as I believe that's what this phase > is for. The push back you are seeing is because this is pretty late in -rc cycle. If this push back was not there the bug fix cycle would probably never close. In all probability, if this was -rc2 or even -rc3 there would not be so much discussion. Thanks, Sekhar