From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933377AbaCTJup (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Mar 2014 05:50:45 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f177.google.com ([74.125.82.177]:47084 "EHLO mail-we0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932984AbaCTJum (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Mar 2014 05:50:42 -0400 Message-ID: <532AB9EC.1030507@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:50:36 +0100 From: Boris BREZILLON User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jean-Jacques Hiblot , Boris BREZILLON CC: Nicolas Ferre , Mike Turquette , Alexandre Belloni , devicetree , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] ARM: at91/dt: define main xtal frequency of the at91sam9261ek board References: <1395173924-3648-1-git-send-email-b.brezillon.dev@gmail.com> <1395173924-3648-10-git-send-email-b.brezillon.dev@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le 20/03/2014 10:24, Jean-Jacques Hiblot a écrit : > 2014-03-18 21:18 GMT+01:00 Boris BREZILLON : >> Define at91sam9261ek main crystal frequency. >> >> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9261ek.dts | 4 ++++ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9261ek.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9261ek.dts >> index 2ce527e..7175986 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9261ek.dts >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9261ek.dts >> @@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ >> compatible = "atmel,osc", "fixed-clock"; >> clock-frequency = <18432000>; >> }; >> + >> + main_xtal: main_xtal { >> + clock-frequency = <18432000>; >> + }; >> }; >> >> ahb { >> -- >> 1.7.9.5 >> > You forgot to remove the old fixed-clock definition for the main_clock: clock@0 We need this clock when CCF is disabled (when using the old at91 clk implementation). I'm afraid we'll have to keep it until we move all sam9 SoCs and boards to CCF (and DT). Best Regards, Boris > > Otherwise: > Acked-by: Jean-Jacques HIBLOT