Re: [PATCH 2/2] coding style: fix line over 80 characters

[Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>]

On 03/20/2014 11:45 PM, Joe Perches wrote:

>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/usbip/vhci_hcd.c b/drivers/staging/usbip/vhci_hcd.c
> []
>>> @@ -271,12 +271,14 @@ static int vhci_hub_control(struct usb_hcd *hcd, u16 typeReq, u16 wValue,
>>>    			}
>>>    			break;
>>>    		case USB_PORT_FEAT_POWER:
>>> -			usbip_dbg_vhci_rh(" ClearPortFeature: USB_PORT_FEAT_POWER\n");
>>> +			usbip_dbg_vhci_rh(
>>> +				" ClearPortFeature: USB_PORT_FEAT_POWER\n");

>>      Your version of scripts/checkpatch.pl seems outdated. It shouldn't
>> complain about strings violating 80-column limit (and I've just verified it
>> doesn't).

> checkpatch complains about > 80 char lines for lines with
> a function where the function name isn't understood to be
> a logging use.

> uspip_dbg_<foo> doesn't take the general form so if the
> string at the EOL exceeds 80 chars, a message is emitted.

> Long standalone strings on a single line do not get warnings.

    OK, but there's still issue that the patch context doesn't correspond to 
what can be seen in Greg's tree. What I am seeing there is broken up string.

WBR, Sergei