From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>,
Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@hp.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/11] pvqspinlock, x86: Allow unfair queue spinlock in a KVM guest
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:29:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <532B6BC8.8010502@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <532B6543.7050707@redhat.com>
On 03/20/2014 03:01 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> No! Please do what I asked you to do. You are not handling Hyper-V or
> VMWare. Just use X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR and it will cover all
> hypervisors that actually follow Intel's guidelines.
>
And for those that don't, we should turn on X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR in
the Linux enumeration code as we do for other features we detect
independently.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-20 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1395260049-30839-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com>
[not found] ` <1395260049-30839-7-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com>
2014-03-20 22:01 ` [PATCH v7 06/11] pvqspinlock, x86: Allow unfair queue spinlock in a KVM guest Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-20 22:29 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2014-03-20 22:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
[not found] ` <1395260049-30839-11-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com>
2014-03-20 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 10/11] pvqspinlock, x86: Enable qspinlock PV support for KVM Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=532B6BC8.8010502@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=Waiman.Long@hp.com \
--cc=akataria@vmware.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=walken@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox