From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: GPF in intel_pmu_lbr_reset() with qemu -cpu host
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:55:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <532CB54C.8020003@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8761n7nryi.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
On 03/21/2014 02:48 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> writes:
>>
>> That's why at least to some extent The Right Thing is not to try to
>> pretend to be a CPU you don't even know how to emulate.
>>
>> But again, that has its own issues, too, mostly with userspace
>> optimization, and making the Linux code more resilient wouldn't hurt.
>> In that sense #GP(0) is *much* better than 0: it unambiguously gives an
>> error to work with.
>
> That means we could just throw rdmsr() away and it would be completely
> replaced with rdmsr_safe(). But then that will likely cause all kinds
> of problems with how to handle these errors and where and how to handle
> these exceptions.
>
> I much prefer just to fix KVM. I cannot think of any case
> where 0 would cause a major issue.
>
> After all it's virtualization not "rewrite complete kernel for it"
>
Actually, Ingo, Borislav and I have been discussing making rdmsr_safe()
more of the default, especially for things like this where the error
handling is obvious (doesn't work? Disable the PMU.)
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-21 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-21 17:42 GPF in intel_pmu_lbr_reset() with qemu -cpu host Peter Wu
2014-03-21 17:46 ` Peter Wu
2014-03-21 19:04 ` Venkatesh Srinivas
2014-03-21 19:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-22 7:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-22 8:50 ` Gleb Natapov
2014-03-22 10:05 ` Peter Wu
2014-03-22 12:27 ` Gleb Natapov
2014-03-22 21:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-22 22:00 ` Peter Wu
2014-03-26 7:23 ` Wu, Feng
2014-03-26 9:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-21 19:29 ` Andi Kleen
2014-03-21 20:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-21 21:37 ` Andi Kleen
2014-03-21 21:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-21 21:48 ` Andi Kleen
2014-03-21 21:55 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2014-03-22 0:22 ` Andi Kleen
2014-03-22 0:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-22 0:30 ` Andi Kleen
2014-03-22 0:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-22 10:01 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=532CB54C.8020003@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peter@lekensteyn.nl \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox