From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752277AbaC0CUW (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Mar 2014 22:20:22 -0400 Received: from mailout32.mail01.mtsvc.net ([216.70.64.70]:39932 "EHLO n23.mail01.mtsvc.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751567AbaC0CUU (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Mar 2014 22:20:20 -0400 Message-ID: <53338ADF.3060803@hurleysoftware.com> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 22:20:15 -0400 From: Peter Hurley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: balbi@ti.com CC: Greg KH , Marcel Holtmann , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, m-karicheri2@ti.com, b32955@freescale.com, Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] bluetooth: hci_ldisc: fix deadlock condition References: <1395343807-21618-1-git-send-email-balbi@ti.com> <1395343807-21618-9-git-send-email-balbi@ti.com> <53337513.1010708@hurleysoftware.com> <20140327020909.GA11651@saruman.home> In-Reply-To: <20140327020909.GA11651@saruman.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-User: 990527 peter@hurleysoftware.com X-MT-ID: 8FA290C2A27252AACF65DBC4A42F3CE3735FB2A4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/26/2014 10:09 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> I just noticed this patch wasn't addressed to Marcel; >> seems like this should go through the bluetooth tree (but not >> through bluetooth-next because it fixes an oops). > > read the archives: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=139534449409583&w=2 Sorry. I did actually get Marcel's reply but Thunderbird didn't parent the reply properly in my inbox and I forgot about it. >> Marcel, >> >> You may want to build on top of this patch split handling; >> I noticed some of the protocol drivers are calling >> hci_uart_tx_wakeup() from work functions already (so don't >> need to schedule another work...) > > I don't think that should be part of $subject, though. I don't understand what you mean here. Regards, Peter Hurley