From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755827AbaC0LMN (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Mar 2014 07:12:13 -0400 Received: from service87.mimecast.com ([91.220.42.44]:35401 "EHLO service87.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752166AbaC0LMK convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Mar 2014 07:12:10 -0400 Message-ID: <5334078A.9010408@arm.com> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 11:12:10 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hanjun Guo , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: Sudeep Holla , "linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Mark Brown , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries again References: <1395738060-18489-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <533153BF.3070308@arm.com> <533163D4.6030205@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <533163D4.6030205@linaro.org> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Mar 2014 11:12:22.0950 (UTC) FILETIME=[6D552460:01CF49AD] X-MC-Unique: 114032711120800701 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Hanjun, On 25/03/14 11:09, Hanjun Guo wrote: > Hi Sudeep, > > On 2014-3-25 18:00, Sudeep Holla wrote: >> Hi Hanjun, >> >> On 25/03/14 09:00, Hanjun Guo wrote: >>> After commit 74397174989e5 (arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries), >>> I still get a duplicate Power management options section in linux-next >>> git repo, may be due to some merge conflicts, anyway, fix that in this >>> patch. >>> >> I reported this and Mark Brown posted the patch[1]. >> I assumed it is already pulled, but looks like that's not the case. > [...] >> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg314472.html [...] > here is the link: > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/arm64/Kconfig > Just had a look at the linux-next tree and looks like the original commit: "cpufreq: enable ARM drivers on arm64" is pulled by both Catalin and Rafael which has resulted in the fixup patch[1] not removing the duplicate entry cleanly. If not too late it better to ask either Rafael or Catalin to drop both patches from their tree, instead of creating 4 patches in total to enable cpufreq :) Regards, Sudeep