public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Jim Lieb <jlieb@panasas.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@canonical.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	bfields@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Thoughts on credential switching
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 14:06:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53342258.8000304@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140327060225.4f4caa5a@ipyr.poochiereds.net>

On 03/27/2014 02:02 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:

>> This interface does not address the long-term lack of POSIX
>> compliance in setuid and friends, which are required to be
>> process-global and not thread-specific (as they are on the kernel
>> side).
>>
>> glibc works around this by reserving a signal and running set*id on
>> every thread in a special signal handler.  This is just crass, and it
>> is likely impossible to restore the original process state in case of
>> partial failure.  We really need kernel support to perform the
>> process-wide switch in an all-or-nothing manner.
>>
>
> I disagree. We're treading new ground here with this syscall. It's
> not defined by POSIX so we're under no obligation to follow its silly
> directives in this regard. Per-process cred switching doesn't really
> make much sense in this day and age, IMO. Wasn't part of the spec was
> written before threading existed

Okay, then we need to add a separate set of system calls.

I really, really want to get rid of that signal handler mess in glibc, 
with its partial failures.

> The per-process credential switching is pretty universally a pain in
> the ass for anyone who wants to write something like a threaded file
> server. Jeremy Allison had to jump through some rather major hoops to
> work around it for Samba [1]. I think we want to strive to make this a
> per-task credential switch and ignore that part of the POSIX spec.

Yeah, I get that, setfsuid/setfsgid already behaves this way.

(Current directory and umask are equally problematic, but it's possible 
to avoid most issues.)

> That said, I think we will need to understand and document what we
> expect to occur if someone does this new switch_creds(fd) call and then
> subsequently calls something like setuid(), if only to ensure that we
> don't get blindsided by it.

Currently, from the kernel perspective, this is not really a problem 
because the credentials are always per-task.  It's just that a 
conforming user space needs the process-wide credentials.

-- 
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-27 13:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-27  0:23 Thoughts on credential switching Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-27  0:42 ` Serge Hallyn
2014-03-27  1:01   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-27 15:41     ` Florian Weimer
2014-03-27 16:21       ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-27  2:48 ` Jeff Layton
2014-03-27  3:05   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-27  3:25     ` Jeff Layton
2014-03-27 14:08       ` Jeff Layton
2014-03-29  6:43         ` Alex Elsayed
2014-03-30 13:03         ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-03-30 18:56           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-31 11:51           ` Jeff Layton
2014-03-31 18:06             ` Trond Myklebust
2014-03-31 18:12               ` Jeff Layton
2014-03-31 19:26               ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-31 20:14                 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-03-31 21:25                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-27 12:46 ` Florian Weimer
2014-03-27 13:02   ` Jeff Layton
2014-03-27 13:06     ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2014-03-27 13:33       ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-04-22 11:37         ` Florian Weimer
2014-04-22 12:14           ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-04-22 16:35             ` Jim Lieb
2014-03-27 14:01       ` Jeff Layton
2014-03-27 18:26         ` Jeremy Allison
2014-03-27 18:46           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-27 18:56             ` Jeremy Allison
2014-03-27 19:02               ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-27 19:30           ` Jim Lieb
2014-03-27 19:45             ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-27 20:47               ` Jim Lieb
2014-03-27 21:19                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-31 10:44 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-03-31 16:49   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-01 20:22     ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-03-31 19:05   ` Jeremy Allison

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53342258.8000304@redhat.com \
    --to=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=bfields@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=jlieb@panasas.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=serge@canonical.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox