From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
To: Ma Haijun <mahaijuns@gmail.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>,
Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [media] videobuf-dma-contig: fix vm_iomap_memory() call
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 10:28:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <533540CE.8070703@xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1395918426-27787-1-git-send-email-mahaijuns@gmail.com>
On 03/27/2014 12:07 PM, Ma Haijun wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a trivial fix, but I think the patch itself has problem too.
> The function requires a phys_addr_t, but we feed it with a dma_handle_t.
> AFAIK, this implicit conversion does not always work.
> Can I use virt_to_phys(mem->vaddr) to get the physical address instead?
> (mem->vaddr and mem->dma_handle are from dma_alloc_coherent)
Does this actually fail? With what driver and on what hardware?
I ask because I am very reluctant to make any changes to videobuf. It is
slowly being replaced by the vastly superior videobuf2 framework. Existing
drivers in the kernel still using the old videobuf seem to work just fine
(or at least as fine as videobuf allows you to be).
Regards,
Hans
>
> Regards
>
> Ma Haijun
>
> Ma Haijun (1):
> [media] videobuf-dma-contig: fix incorrect argument to
> vm_iomap_memory() call
>
> drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-dma-contig.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-28 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-27 11:07 [media] videobuf-dma-contig: fix vm_iomap_memory() call Ma Haijun
2014-03-28 9:28 ` Hans Verkuil [this message]
2014-03-28 16:58 ` Ma Haijun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=533540CE.8070703@xs4all.nl \
--to=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.chehab@samsung.com \
--cc=mahaijuns@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox