From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751912AbaC1Kdq (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Mar 2014 06:33:46 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.64]:18441 "EHLO szxga01-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751180AbaC1Kdp (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Mar 2014 06:33:45 -0400 Message-ID: <53354D68.6040800@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 18:22:32 +0800 From: Li Zefan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Catalin Marinas CC: Andrew Morton , LKML , "linux-mm@kvack.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] kmemleak: allow freeing internal objects after kmemleak was disabled References: <5335384A.2000000@huawei.com> <5335387E.2050005@huawei.com> <20140328101315.GB21330@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20140328101315.GB21330@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.18.230] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> + if (!kmemleak_has_leaks) >> + __kmemleak_do_cleanup(); >> + else >> + pr_info("Disable kmemleak without freeing internal objects, " >> + "so you may still check information on memory leaks. " >> + "You may reclaim memory by writing \"clear\" to " >> + "/sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak\n"); > > Alternative text: > > pr_info("Kmemleak disabled without freeing internal data. " > "Reclaim the memory with \"echo clear > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak\"\n"); > > (I'm wouldn't bother with long lines in printk strings) > > Otherwise: > > Acked-by: Catalin Marinas > Thanks for the review!