From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
David Long <dave.long@linaro.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>,
Jonathan Lebon <jlebon@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] uprobes/x86: Gather "riprel" functions together
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 12:21:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <533A30C1.5010407@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140331194409.GA9297@redhat.com>
(2014/04/01 4:44), Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Cosmetic. Move pre_xol_rip_insn() and handle_riprel_post_xol() up
> to the closely related handle_riprel_insn().
>
> This way it is simpler to read and understand this code, and this
> lessens the number of ifdef's.
>
> TODO: rename them somehow to make the naming consistent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Looks good to me:)
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Thank you,
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> index 382a69d..e8d7b38 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> @@ -313,6 +313,48 @@ handle_riprel_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
> }
> }
>
> +/*
> + * If we're emulating a rip-relative instruction, save the contents
> + * of the scratch register and store the target address in that register.
> + */
> +static void
> +pre_xol_rip_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs,
> + struct arch_uprobe_task *autask)
> +{
> + if (auprobe->fixups & UPROBE_FIX_RIP_AX) {
> + autask->saved_scratch_register = regs->ax;
> + regs->ax = current->utask->vaddr;
> + regs->ax += auprobe->rip_rela_target_address;
> + } else if (auprobe->fixups & UPROBE_FIX_RIP_CX) {
> + autask->saved_scratch_register = regs->cx;
> + regs->cx = current->utask->vaddr;
> + regs->cx += auprobe->rip_rela_target_address;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +handle_riprel_post_xol(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs, long *correction)
> +{
> + if (auprobe->fixups & (UPROBE_FIX_RIP_AX | UPROBE_FIX_RIP_CX)) {
> + struct arch_uprobe_task *autask;
> +
> + autask = ¤t->utask->autask;
> + if (auprobe->fixups & UPROBE_FIX_RIP_AX)
> + regs->ax = autask->saved_scratch_register;
> + else
> + regs->cx = autask->saved_scratch_register;
> +
> + /*
> + * The original instruction includes a displacement, and so
> + * is 4 bytes longer than what we've just single-stepped.
> + * Fall through to handle stuff like "jmpq *...(%rip)" and
> + * "callq *...(%rip)".
> + */
> + if (correction)
> + *correction += 4;
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int validate_insn_64bits(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
> {
> insn_init(insn, auprobe->insn, true);
> @@ -339,9 +381,19 @@ static int validate_insn_bits(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm,
> return validate_insn_64bits(auprobe, insn);
> }
> #else /* 32-bit: */
> +/*
> + * No RIP-relative addressing on 32-bit
> + */
> static void handle_riprel_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
> {
> - /* No RIP-relative addressing on 32-bit */
> +}
> +static void pre_xol_rip_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs,
> + struct arch_uprobe_task *autask)
> +{
> +}
> +static void handle_riprel_post_xol(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs,
> + long *correction)
> +{
> }
>
> static int validate_insn_bits(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, struct insn *insn)
> @@ -413,34 +465,6 @@ int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> -/*
> - * If we're emulating a rip-relative instruction, save the contents
> - * of the scratch register and store the target address in that register.
> - */
> -static void
> -pre_xol_rip_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs,
> - struct arch_uprobe_task *autask)
> -{
> - if (auprobe->fixups & UPROBE_FIX_RIP_AX) {
> - autask->saved_scratch_register = regs->ax;
> - regs->ax = current->utask->vaddr;
> - regs->ax += auprobe->rip_rela_target_address;
> - } else if (auprobe->fixups & UPROBE_FIX_RIP_CX) {
> - autask->saved_scratch_register = regs->cx;
> - regs->cx = current->utask->vaddr;
> - regs->cx += auprobe->rip_rela_target_address;
> - }
> -}
> -#else
> -static void
> -pre_xol_rip_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs,
> - struct arch_uprobe_task *autask)
> -{
> - /* No RIP-relative addressing on 32-bit */
> -}
> -#endif
> -
> /*
> * arch_uprobe_pre_xol - prepare to execute out of line.
> * @auprobe: the probepoint information.
> @@ -490,42 +514,6 @@ static int adjust_ret_addr(unsigned long sp, long correction)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> -static bool is_riprel_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe)
> -{
> - return ((auprobe->fixups & (UPROBE_FIX_RIP_AX | UPROBE_FIX_RIP_CX)) != 0);
> -}
> -
> -static void
> -handle_riprel_post_xol(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs, long *correction)
> -{
> - if (is_riprel_insn(auprobe)) {
> - struct arch_uprobe_task *autask;
> -
> - autask = ¤t->utask->autask;
> - if (auprobe->fixups & UPROBE_FIX_RIP_AX)
> - regs->ax = autask->saved_scratch_register;
> - else
> - regs->cx = autask->saved_scratch_register;
> -
> - /*
> - * The original instruction includes a displacement, and so
> - * is 4 bytes longer than what we've just single-stepped.
> - * Fall through to handle stuff like "jmpq *...(%rip)" and
> - * "callq *...(%rip)".
> - */
> - if (correction)
> - *correction += 4;
> - }
> -}
> -#else
> -static void
> -handle_riprel_post_xol(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs, long *correction)
> -{
> - /* No RIP-relative addressing on 32-bit */
> -}
> -#endif
> -
> /*
> * If xol insn itself traps and generates a signal(Say,
> * SIGILL/SIGSEGV/etc), then detect the case where a singlestepped
>
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-01 3:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-31 19:43 [PATCH 0/7] uprobes/x86: introduce uprobe_xol_ops and arch_uprobe->ops Oleg Nesterov
2014-03-31 19:43 ` [PATCH 1/7] uprobes: Kill UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP and can_skip_sstep() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-01 1:41 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-01 15:39 ` David Long
2014-04-03 16:32 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-03-31 19:43 ` [PATCH 2/7] uprobes/x86: Fold prepare_fixups() into arch_uprobe_analyze_insn() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-01 2:00 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-03 16:33 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-03-31 19:44 ` [PATCH 3/7] uprobes/x86: Conditionalize the usage of handle_riprel_insn() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-01 3:17 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-01 14:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-01 16:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-02 17:57 ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-02 19:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-03-31 19:44 ` [PATCH 4/7] uprobes/x86: Kill the "ia32_compat" check in handle_riprel_insn(), remove "mm" arg Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-01 3:10 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-03 16:33 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-03-31 19:44 ` [PATCH 5/7] uprobes/x86: Gather "riprel" functions together Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-01 3:21 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2014-04-02 19:53 ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-03 19:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-03-31 19:44 ` [PATCH 6/7] uprobes/x86: move the UPROBE_FIX_{RIP,IP,CALL} code at the end of pre/post hooks Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-01 3:24 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-03 16:34 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-03-31 19:44 ` [PATCH 7/7] uprobes/x86: Introduce uprobe_xol_ops and arch_uprobe->ops Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-01 6:52 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-01 14:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-01 15:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-02 19:46 ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-03 19:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-02 19:58 ` [PATCH 0/7] uprobes/x86: introduce " Jim Keniston
2014-04-03 20:00 ` [PATCH 8-9/7] " Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-03 20:00 ` [PATCH 8/7] uprobes/x86: Send SIGILL if arch_uprobe_post_xol() fails Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-03 20:01 ` [PATCH 9/7] uprobes/x86: Teach arch_uprobe_post_xol() to restart if possible Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=533A30C1.5010407@hitachi.com \
--to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dave.long@linaro.org \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jlebon@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).