linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	David Long <dave.long@linaro.org>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>,
	Jonathan Lebon <jlebon@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] uprobes/x86: Gather "riprel" functions together
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 12:21:37 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <533A30C1.5010407@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140331194409.GA9297@redhat.com>

(2014/04/01 4:44), Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Cosmetic. Move pre_xol_rip_insn() and handle_riprel_post_xol() up
> to the closely related handle_riprel_insn().
> 
> This way it is simpler to read and understand this code, and this
> lessens the number of ifdef's.
> 
> TODO: rename them somehow to make the naming consistent.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>

Looks good to me:)

Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>

Thank you,

> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c |  118 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>  1 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> index 382a69d..e8d7b38 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> @@ -313,6 +313,48 @@ handle_riprel_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * If we're emulating a rip-relative instruction, save the contents
> + * of the scratch register and store the target address in that register.
> + */
> +static void
> +pre_xol_rip_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs,
> +				struct arch_uprobe_task *autask)
> +{
> +	if (auprobe->fixups & UPROBE_FIX_RIP_AX) {
> +		autask->saved_scratch_register = regs->ax;
> +		regs->ax = current->utask->vaddr;
> +		regs->ax += auprobe->rip_rela_target_address;
> +	} else if (auprobe->fixups & UPROBE_FIX_RIP_CX) {
> +		autask->saved_scratch_register = regs->cx;
> +		regs->cx = current->utask->vaddr;
> +		regs->cx += auprobe->rip_rela_target_address;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +handle_riprel_post_xol(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs, long *correction)
> +{
> +	if (auprobe->fixups & (UPROBE_FIX_RIP_AX | UPROBE_FIX_RIP_CX)) {
> +		struct arch_uprobe_task *autask;
> +
> +		autask = &current->utask->autask;
> +		if (auprobe->fixups & UPROBE_FIX_RIP_AX)
> +			regs->ax = autask->saved_scratch_register;
> +		else
> +			regs->cx = autask->saved_scratch_register;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * The original instruction includes a displacement, and so
> +		 * is 4 bytes longer than what we've just single-stepped.
> +		 * Fall through to handle stuff like "jmpq *...(%rip)" and
> +		 * "callq *...(%rip)".
> +		 */
> +		if (correction)
> +			*correction += 4;
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static int validate_insn_64bits(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
>  {
>  	insn_init(insn, auprobe->insn, true);
> @@ -339,9 +381,19 @@ static int validate_insn_bits(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm,
>  	return validate_insn_64bits(auprobe, insn);
>  }
>  #else /* 32-bit: */
> +/*
> + * No RIP-relative addressing on 32-bit
> + */
>  static void handle_riprel_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
>  {
> -	/* No RIP-relative addressing on 32-bit */
> +}
> +static void pre_xol_rip_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs,
> +				struct arch_uprobe_task *autask)
> +{
> +}
> +static void handle_riprel_post_xol(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs,
> +					long *correction)
> +{
>  }
>  
>  static int validate_insn_bits(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm,  struct insn *insn)
> @@ -413,34 +465,6 @@ int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> -/*
> - * If we're emulating a rip-relative instruction, save the contents
> - * of the scratch register and store the target address in that register.
> - */
> -static void
> -pre_xol_rip_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs,
> -				struct arch_uprobe_task *autask)
> -{
> -	if (auprobe->fixups & UPROBE_FIX_RIP_AX) {
> -		autask->saved_scratch_register = regs->ax;
> -		regs->ax = current->utask->vaddr;
> -		regs->ax += auprobe->rip_rela_target_address;
> -	} else if (auprobe->fixups & UPROBE_FIX_RIP_CX) {
> -		autask->saved_scratch_register = regs->cx;
> -		regs->cx = current->utask->vaddr;
> -		regs->cx += auprobe->rip_rela_target_address;
> -	}
> -}
> -#else
> -static void
> -pre_xol_rip_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs,
> -				struct arch_uprobe_task *autask)
> -{
> -	/* No RIP-relative addressing on 32-bit */
> -}
> -#endif
> -
>  /*
>   * arch_uprobe_pre_xol - prepare to execute out of line.
>   * @auprobe: the probepoint information.
> @@ -490,42 +514,6 @@ static int adjust_ret_addr(unsigned long sp, long correction)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> -static bool is_riprel_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe)
> -{
> -	return ((auprobe->fixups & (UPROBE_FIX_RIP_AX | UPROBE_FIX_RIP_CX)) != 0);
> -}
> -
> -static void
> -handle_riprel_post_xol(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs, long *correction)
> -{
> -	if (is_riprel_insn(auprobe)) {
> -		struct arch_uprobe_task *autask;
> -
> -		autask = &current->utask->autask;
> -		if (auprobe->fixups & UPROBE_FIX_RIP_AX)
> -			regs->ax = autask->saved_scratch_register;
> -		else
> -			regs->cx = autask->saved_scratch_register;
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * The original instruction includes a displacement, and so
> -		 * is 4 bytes longer than what we've just single-stepped.
> -		 * Fall through to handle stuff like "jmpq *...(%rip)" and
> -		 * "callq *...(%rip)".
> -		 */
> -		if (correction)
> -			*correction += 4;
> -	}
> -}
> -#else
> -static void
> -handle_riprel_post_xol(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs, long *correction)
> -{
> -	/* No RIP-relative addressing on 32-bit */
> -}
> -#endif
> -
>  /*
>   * If xol insn itself traps and generates a signal(Say,
>   * SIGILL/SIGSEGV/etc), then detect the case where a singlestepped
> 


-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com



  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-01  3:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-31 19:43 [PATCH 0/7] uprobes/x86: introduce uprobe_xol_ops and arch_uprobe->ops Oleg Nesterov
2014-03-31 19:43 ` [PATCH 1/7] uprobes: Kill UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP and can_skip_sstep() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-01  1:41   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-01 15:39   ` David Long
2014-04-03 16:32   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-03-31 19:43 ` [PATCH 2/7] uprobes/x86: Fold prepare_fixups() into arch_uprobe_analyze_insn() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-01  2:00   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-03 16:33   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-03-31 19:44 ` [PATCH 3/7] uprobes/x86: Conditionalize the usage of handle_riprel_insn() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-01  3:17   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-01 14:33     ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-01 16:39       ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-02 17:57         ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-02 19:14           ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-03-31 19:44 ` [PATCH 4/7] uprobes/x86: Kill the "ia32_compat" check in handle_riprel_insn(), remove "mm" arg Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-01  3:10   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-03 16:33   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-03-31 19:44 ` [PATCH 5/7] uprobes/x86: Gather "riprel" functions together Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-01  3:21   ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2014-04-02 19:53   ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-03 19:50     ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-03-31 19:44 ` [PATCH 6/7] uprobes/x86: move the UPROBE_FIX_{RIP,IP,CALL} code at the end of pre/post hooks Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-01  3:24   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-03 16:34   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-03-31 19:44 ` [PATCH 7/7] uprobes/x86: Introduce uprobe_xol_ops and arch_uprobe->ops Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-01  6:52   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-01 14:44     ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-01 15:01   ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-02 19:46   ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-03 19:49     ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-02 19:58 ` [PATCH 0/7] uprobes/x86: introduce " Jim Keniston
2014-04-03 20:00 ` [PATCH 8-9/7] " Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-03 20:00   ` [PATCH 8/7] uprobes/x86: Send SIGILL if arch_uprobe_post_xol() fails Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-03 20:01   ` [PATCH 9/7] uprobes/x86: Teach arch_uprobe_post_xol() to restart if possible Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=533A30C1.5010407@hitachi.com \
    --to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dave.long@linaro.org \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=fche@redhat.com \
    --cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jlebon@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).