From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757416AbaDBDl6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Apr 2014 23:41:58 -0400 Received: from e28smtp08.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.8]:54662 "EHLO e28smtp08.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756716AbaDBDl4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Apr 2014 23:41:56 -0400 Message-ID: <533B86A5.90700@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 09:10:21 +0530 From: Anshuman Khandual User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Neuling CC: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] powerpc, ptrace: Add few more ptrace request macros References: <1396350893-4456-1-git-send-email-khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <25834.1396399387@ale.ozlabs.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <25834.1396399387@ale.ozlabs.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 14040203-2000-0000-0000-00001072E549 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/02/2014 06:13 AM, Michael Neuling wrote: > Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> > This patch adds few more ptrace request macros expanding >> > the existing capability. These ptrace requests macros can >> > be classified into two categories. > Why is this only an RFC? > Looking for comments, suggestions, concerns from people. But looks like its bit big a patch to review at once. > Also, please share the test case that you wrote for this. Will split the patch into multiple components, add the test case and send out again.