From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757604AbaDHTJJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2014 15:09:09 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:24704 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757267AbaDHTJH (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2014 15:09:07 -0400 Message-ID: <53444926.4020504@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 15:08:22 -0400 From: Rik van Riel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds , Mel Gorman CC: "H. Peter Anvin" , Linux-X86 , Cyrill Gorcunov , Ingo Molnar , Steven Noonan , David Vrabel , Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , Andrea Arcangeli , Dave Hansen , Srikar Dronamraju , Linux-MM , LKML Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Use an alternative to _PAGE_PROTNONE for _PAGE_NUMA v2 References: <1396962570-18762-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <53440A5D.6050301@zytor.com> <20140408164652.GL7292@suse.de> <20140408185146.GP7292@suse.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/08/2014 02:55 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Mel Gorman wrote: >> >> I picked a solution. The posted series uses a different bit. > > Yes, and I actually like that. I have nothing against your patch > series. I'm ranting and raving because you then seemed to say "maybe > we shouldn't pick a solution after all" when you said: FWIW, Mel's patches look good to me. -- All rights reversed