From: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Jim Keniston <jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <aarapov@redhat.com>,
David Long <dave.long@linaro.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Lebon <jlebon@redhat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative call's
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:30:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5346AB07.4090909@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140410141806.GA23997@redhat.com>
On 04/10/2014 04:18 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 04/10, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>>
>> There is this monstrosity, "16-bit override for branches" in 64-mode:
>>
>> 66 e8 nn nn callw <offset16>
>>
>> Nobody sane uses it because it truncates instruction pointer.
>>
>> Or rather, *I think* it should truncate it (i.e. zero-extend to full width),
>> but conceivably some CPUs can be buggy wrt that:
>> they can decide to modify only lower 16 bits of IP,
>> or even they can decided to use signed <offset16> but apply it
>> to full-width RIP.
>>
>> AMD manuals are not clear on what exactly should happen.
>>
>> I am sure no one sane uses this form of branch instructions
>> in 32-bit and 64-bit code.
>>
>> I don't think we should be trying to support it "correctly"
>> (we can just let program crash with SIGILL or something),
>> we only need to make sure we don't overlook its existence
>> and thus are not tricked into touching or modifying unrelated data.
>
> And after the quick check it seems that lib/insn.c doesn't parse
> "66 e8 nn nn" correctly. It treats the next 2 bytes as the part
> of 32bit offset.
I didn't run-test it yet. By code inspection, it seems to work...
x86-opcode-map.txt:
e8: CALL Jz (f64)
gen-insn-attr-x86.awk:
imm_flag["Jz"] = "INAT_MAKE_IMM(INAT_IMM_VWORD32)"
insn.c:
case INAT_IMM_VWORD32:
if (!__get_immv32(insn))
goto err_out;
...
static int __get_immv32(struct insn *insn)
{
switch (insn->opnd_bytes) {
case 2:
insn->immediate.value = get_next(short, insn);
insn->immediate.nbytes = 2;
break;
case 4:
case 8:
insn->immediate.value = get_next(int, insn);
insn->immediate.nbytes = 4;
break;
...until I notice this code:
void insn_get_modrm(struct insn *insn)
{
...
if (insn->x86_64 && inat_is_force64(insn->attr))
insn->opnd_bytes = 8;
The (f64) modifier in x86-opcode-map.txt means that inat_is_force64()
is true for call opcode. So we won't reach "case 2:" in __get_immv32():
insn_get_prefixes() did set insn->opnd_bytes to 2 when it saw 0x66 prefix,
but it was before we reach this place, and here we overrode it.
This is a bug in insn decoder.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-10 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-04 18:50 [PATCH v2 0/9] uprobes/x86: preparations to fix the reprel jmp/call handling Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] uprobes: Kill UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP and can_skip_sstep() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] uprobes/x86: Fold prepare_fixups() into arch_uprobe_analyze_insn() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] uprobes/x86: Kill the "ia32_compat" check in handle_riprel_insn(), remove "mm" arg Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] uprobes/x86: Gather "riprel" functions together Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] uprobes/x86: move the UPROBE_FIX_{RIP,IP,CALL} code at the end of pre/post hooks Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] uprobes/x86: Introduce uprobe_xol_ops and arch_uprobe->ops Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-08 9:10 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-08 16:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-08 18:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-09 12:58 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-09 16:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-10 13:58 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-04 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] uprobes/x86: Conditionalize the usage of handle_riprel_insn() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] uprobes/x86: Send SIGILL if arch_uprobe_post_xol() fails Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] uprobes/x86: Teach arch_uprobe_post_xol() to restart if possible Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 21:56 ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-05 12:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 19:32 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] uprobes/x86: preparations to fix the reprel jmp/call handling Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 19:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 23:44 ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-06 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] uprobes/x86: " Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-06 20:16 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate unconditional rip-relative jmp's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-08 20:36 ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-09 14:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-06 20:16 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate nop's using ops->emulate() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-06 20:16 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] uprobes/x86: Introduce sizeof_long(), cleanup adjust_ret_addr() and arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-07 20:34 ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-07 20:42 ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-06 20:16 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative call's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-08 22:26 ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-09 15:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-09 21:25 ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-10 4:05 ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-10 13:41 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-10 13:57 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-10 14:20 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-11 3:03 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-11 12:23 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-14 14:22 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-18 15:17 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-10 14:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-10 17:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-11 2:38 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-11 1:29 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-10 14:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-10 14:30 ` Denys Vlasenko [this message]
2014-04-10 17:02 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-14 5:14 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-14 12:24 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-14 14:05 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-06 20:16 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative conditional "short" jmp's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-07 14:27 ` [RFC PATCH v2 " Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-07 16:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-08 22:53 ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-09 16:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-06 20:16 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative conditional "near" jmp's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-07 14:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-08 23:07 ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-09 16:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-07 18:54 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] uprobes/x86: fix the reprel jmp/call handling Jim Keniston
2014-04-08 11:43 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-08 16:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-08 19:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-09 19:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 " Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-09 19:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] uprobes/x86: Introduce sizeof_long(), cleanup adjust_ret_addr() and arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-09 19:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate unconditional rip-relative jmp's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-10 12:37 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-10 13:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-09 19:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate nop's using ops->emulate() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-09 19:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative call's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-10 12:53 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-10 13:15 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-10 13:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-09 19:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative conditional "short" jmp's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-09 19:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative conditional "near" jmp's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-10 12:49 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-09 21:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] uprobes/x86: fix the reprel jmp/call handling Jim Keniston
2014-04-10 12:28 ` Denys Vlasenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5346AB07.4090909@redhat.com \
--to=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=aarapov@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dave.long@linaro.org \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jlebon@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).