linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	Anton Arapov <aarapov@redhat.com>,
	David Long <dave.long@linaro.org>,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
	Jonathan Lebon <jlebon@redhat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative call's
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 23:22:38 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <534BEF2E.9050502@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK1hOcMO7HUUihGwxYW8PkkLtA2mAZSc9J2JMuehHEWoX15rUQ@mail.gmail.com>

(2014/04/11 21:23), Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Masami Hiramatsu
> <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> wrote:
>> At least, if we can trust Intel SDM, it says that depends
>> on the operand-size (insn->opnd_bytes) and stack segment
>> descriptor. Please check the SDM vol.1 6.2.2 Stack Alignment
>> and vol.2a, 3.2 Instructions (A-M), CALL--Call Procedure.
>> But we'd better check it on x86-32.
> 
> I am past trusting CPU manuals on this one:
> 
> By now I verified on the real hardware that AMD and Intel CPUs
> handle this insn differently in 64-bit mode: Intel ignores 0x66 prefix.
> AMD treats this insn the same as in 32-bit mode: as 16-bit insn.
> 
> (Should I submit a patch adding comment about it
> in x86-opcode-map.txt?)

Yeah, feel free to do so :)

> So there is no universally "correct" way to emulate it.
> 
> We, theoretically, can decode it differently *depending
> on actual CPU(s) on the system*... do we really want
> to go *that* far? I guess not.

No I guess not too. If we start such thing, we need to cover
other x86 variants too... And actually jump/callw is not a
normal instructions.

BTW, I can see that difference on AMD64 architecture programmers
manual vol.3 appendix A. It seems that the difference is by
design...

Thank you,

-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com



  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-14 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-04 18:50 [PATCH v2 0/9] uprobes/x86: preparations to fix the reprel jmp/call handling Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] uprobes: Kill UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP and can_skip_sstep() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] uprobes/x86: Fold prepare_fixups() into arch_uprobe_analyze_insn() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] uprobes/x86: Kill the "ia32_compat" check in handle_riprel_insn(), remove "mm" arg Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] uprobes/x86: Gather "riprel" functions together Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] uprobes/x86: move the UPROBE_FIX_{RIP,IP,CALL} code at the end of pre/post hooks Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] uprobes/x86: Introduce uprobe_xol_ops and arch_uprobe->ops Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-08  9:10   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-08 16:10     ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-08 18:10       ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-09 12:58       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-09 16:55         ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-10 13:58           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-04 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] uprobes/x86: Conditionalize the usage of handle_riprel_insn() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] uprobes/x86: Send SIGILL if arch_uprobe_post_xol() fails Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] uprobes/x86: Teach arch_uprobe_post_xol() to restart if possible Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 21:56   ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-05 12:46     ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 19:32 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] uprobes/x86: preparations to fix the reprel jmp/call handling Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 19:52   ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 23:44   ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-06 20:15     ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] uprobes/x86: " Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-06 20:16       ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate unconditional rip-relative jmp's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-08 20:36         ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-09 14:47           ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-06 20:16       ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate nop's using ops->emulate() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-06 20:16       ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] uprobes/x86: Introduce sizeof_long(), cleanup adjust_ret_addr() and arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-07 20:34         ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-07 20:42           ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-06 20:16       ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative call's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-08 22:26         ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-09 15:43           ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-09 21:25             ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-10  4:05               ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-10 13:41             ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-10 13:57               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-10 14:20                 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-11  3:03                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-11 12:23                     ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-14 14:22                       ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2014-04-18 15:17                         ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-10 14:28                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-10 17:00                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-11  2:38                     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-11  1:29                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-10 14:18               ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-10 14:30                 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-10 17:02                   ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-14  5:14                     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-14 12:24                       ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-14 14:05                         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-06 20:16       ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative conditional "short" jmp's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-07 14:27         ` [RFC PATCH v2 " Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-07 16:41           ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-08 22:53           ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-09 16:42             ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-06 20:16       ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative conditional "near" jmp's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-07 14:28         ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-08 23:07           ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-09 16:50             ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-07 18:54       ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] uprobes/x86: fix the reprel jmp/call handling Jim Keniston
2014-04-08 11:43       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-08 16:28         ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-08 19:26           ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-09 19:44       ` [RFC PATCH v2 " Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-09 19:44         ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] uprobes/x86: Introduce sizeof_long(), cleanup adjust_ret_addr() and arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-09 19:44         ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate unconditional rip-relative jmp's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-10 12:37           ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-10 13:47             ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-09 19:44         ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate nop's using ops->emulate() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-09 19:44         ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative call's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-10 12:53           ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-10 13:15             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-10 13:41               ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-09 19:44         ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative conditional "short" jmp's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-09 19:44         ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative conditional "near" jmp's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-10 12:49           ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-09 21:34         ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] uprobes/x86: fix the reprel jmp/call handling Jim Keniston
2014-04-10 12:28         ` Denys Vlasenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=534BEF2E.9050502@hitachi.com \
    --to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=aarapov@redhat.com \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dave.long@linaro.org \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=fche@redhat.com \
    --cc=jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jlebon@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).