public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>,
	Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>,
	Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>, Rohit Jnagal <jnagal@google.com>,
	Brandon Philips <brandon.philips@coreos.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH cgroup/for-3.16] cgroup: add documentation about unified hierarchy
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 13:16:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <534EE512.5090905@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140416135120.GI30990@htj.dyndns.org>

On 04/16/2014 06:51 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 03:36:29PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> +depending on the specific controller.  IOW, hierarchy may be collapsed
>>
>> please spell out IOW
> 
> Updated, but is this really necessary?

It depends on who your audience is.  I probably think that the audience
is larger than you think it is.

>> I would prefer to see CPU instead of cpu (except when it refers to a
>> task or function).
> 
> cpu sometimes refer to the cpu controller.  Will use CPU when it's
> actually referring to the CPU.

OK, thanks.


-- 
~Randy

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-16 20:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-14 22:09 [PATCH cgroup/for-3.16] cgroup: add documentation about unified hierarchy Tejun Heo
2014-04-15 22:36 ` Randy Dunlap
2014-04-16 13:51   ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-16 20:16     ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2014-04-17  1:41       ` Li Zefan
2014-04-16 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2014-04-22 16:27   ` Michal Hocko
2014-04-22 21:14     ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=534EE512.5090905@infradead.org \
    --to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=arozansk@redhat.com \
    --cc=brandon.philips@coreos.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jnagal@google.com \
    --cc=kay@vrfy.org \
    --cc=lennart@poettering.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox