public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>
To: jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com, Andrey Tsyvarev <tsyvarev@ispras.ru>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: f2fs: BUG_ON() is triggered when mount valid f2fs filesystem
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 18:11:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <534F2A32.9030405@ispras.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1397691337.7727.18.camel@kjgkr>

Hi,

But would not ability to trigger BUG_ON by mounting a crafted image
considered as an issue having security implications?

Regards,
Alexey


On 16.04.2014 16:35, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2014-04-16 (수), 13:11 +0400, Andrey Tsyvarev:
>> Hi,
>>
>> With this patch mounting of the image continues to fail (with similar 
>> BUG_ON).
>> But when image is formatted again (and steps mentioned in the previous 
>> message are performed),
>> mounting of it is now succeed.
>>
>> Is this is a true purpose of the patch?
> Indeed. The patch solves there-in root cause.
> But, if you're trying to use the failed image again, simply you can skip
> the errorneous part by:
>
> # mount ... -o disable_roll_forward ...
>
> Once sync or umount whatever checkpoint is done after that, the image
> will be mounted without "disable_roll_forward".
>
> Thanks,
>
>> 15.04.2014 15:04, Jaegeuk Kim пишет:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thank you for the report.
>>> I retrieved the fault image and found out that previous garbage data
>>> wreak such the wrong behaviors.
>>> So, I wrote the following patch that fills one zero-block at the
>>> checkpoint procedure.
>>> If the underlying device supports discard, I expect that it mostly
>>> doesn't incur any performance regression significantly.
>>>
>>> Could you test this patch?
>>>
>>> >From 60588ceb7277aae2a79e7f67f5217d1256720d78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:57:55 +0900
>>> Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: avoid to conduct roll-forward due to the remained
>>>   garbage blocks
>>>
>>> The f2fs always scans the next chain of direct node blocks.
>>> But some garbage blocks are able to be remained due to no discard
>>> support or
>>> SSR triggers.
>>> This occasionally wreaks recovering wrong inodes that were used or
>>> BUG_ONs
>>> due to reallocating node ids as follows.
>>>
>>> When mount this f2fs image:
>>> http://linuxtesting.org/downloads/f2fs_fault_image.zip
>>> BUG_ON is triggered in f2fs driver (messages below are generated on
>>> kernel 3.13.2; for other kernels output is similar):
>>>
>>> kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/node.c:215!
>>>   Call Trace:
>>>   [<ffffffffa032ebad>] recover_inode_page+0x1fd/0x3e0 [f2fs]
>>>   [<ffffffff811446e7>] ? __lock_page+0x67/0x70
>>>   [<ffffffff81089990>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x50/0x50
>>>   [<ffffffffa0337788>] recover_fsync_data+0x1398/0x15d0 [f2fs]
>>>   [<ffffffff812b9e5c>] ? selinux_d_instantiate+0x1c/0x20
>>>   [<ffffffff811cb20b>] ? d_instantiate+0x5b/0x80
>>>   [<ffffffffa0321044>] f2fs_fill_super+0xb04/0xbf0 [f2fs]
>>>   [<ffffffff811b861e>] ? mount_bdev+0x7e/0x210
>>>   [<ffffffff811b8769>] mount_bdev+0x1c9/0x210
>>>   [<ffffffffa0320540>] ? validate_superblock+0x210/0x210 [f2fs]
>>>   [<ffffffffa031cf8d>] f2fs_mount+0x1d/0x30 [f2fs]
>>>   [<ffffffff811b9497>] mount_fs+0x47/0x1c0
>>>   [<ffffffff81166e00>] ? __alloc_percpu+0x10/0x20
>>>   [<ffffffff811d4032>] vfs_kern_mount+0x72/0x110
>>>   [<ffffffff811d6763>] do_mount+0x493/0x910
>>>   [<ffffffff811615cb>] ? strndup_user+0x5b/0x80
>>>   [<ffffffff811d6c70>] SyS_mount+0x90/0xe0
>>>   [<ffffffff8166f8d9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>>>
>>> Found by Linux File System Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Andrey Tsyvarev <tsyvarev@ispras.ru>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
>>> ---
>>>   fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c |  6 ++++++
>>>   fs/f2fs/f2fs.h       |  1 +
>>>   fs/f2fs/segment.c    | 17 +++++++++++++++--
>>>   3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>>> index 4aa521a..890e23d 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>>> @@ -762,6 +762,12 @@ static void do_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>> bool is_umount)
>>>   	void *kaddr;
>>>   	int i;
>>>   
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * This avoids to conduct wrong roll-forward operations and uses
>>> +	 * metapages, so should be called prior to sync_meta_pages below.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	discard_next_dnode(sbi);
>>> +
>>>   	/* Flush all the NAT/SIT pages */
>>>   	while (get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_META))
>>>   		sync_meta_pages(sbi, META, LONG_MAX);
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> index 2ecac83..2c5a5da 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> @@ -1179,6 +1179,7 @@ int f2fs_issue_flush(struct f2fs_sb_info *);
>>>   void invalidate_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *, block_t);
>>>   void refresh_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *, block_t, block_t);
>>>   void clear_prefree_segments(struct f2fs_sb_info *);
>>> +void discard_next_dnode(struct f2fs_sb_info *);
>>>   int npages_for_summary_flush(struct f2fs_sb_info *);
>>>   void allocate_new_segments(struct f2fs_sb_info *);
>>>   struct page *get_sum_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *, unsigned int);
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>>> index 1e264e7..9993f94 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>>> @@ -335,13 +335,26 @@ static void locate_dirty_segment(struct
>>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int segno)
>>>   	mutex_unlock(&dirty_i->seglist_lock);
>>>   }
>>>   
>>> -static void f2fs_issue_discard(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>> +static int f2fs_issue_discard(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>   				block_t blkstart, block_t blklen)
>>>   {
>>>   	sector_t start = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(sbi, blkstart);
>>>   	sector_t len = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(sbi, blklen);
>>> -	blkdev_issue_discard(sbi->sb->s_bdev, start, len, GFP_NOFS, 0);
>>>   	trace_f2fs_issue_discard(sbi->sb, blkstart, blklen);
>>> +	return blkdev_issue_discard(sbi->sb->s_bdev, start, len, GFP_NOFS, 0);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +void discard_next_dnode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, CURSEG_WARM_NODE);
>>> +	block_t blkaddr = NEXT_FREE_BLKADDR(sbi, curseg);
>>> +
>>> +	if (f2fs_issue_discard(sbi, blkaddr, 1)) {
>>> +		struct page *page = grab_meta_page(sbi, blkaddr);
>>> +		/* zero-filled page */
>>> +		set_page_dirty(page);
>>> +		f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
>>> +	}
>>>   }
>>>   
>>>   static void add_discard_addrs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,


  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-17  1:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-06  5:43 f2fs: f2fs unmount hangs if f2fs_init_acl() fails during mkdir syscall Andrey Tsyvarev
2014-02-06  6:02 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2014-02-06 12:17   ` Andrey Tsyvarev
2014-02-07  0:49     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2014-02-07  5:12       ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2014-02-11  8:29         ` Andrey Tsyvarev
2014-02-13  8:32           ` Gu Zheng
2014-02-13  9:40             ` Andrey Tsyvarev
2014-02-13  9:48               ` Gu Zheng
2014-02-14  2:00                 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2014-02-14  1:58           ` Jaegeuk Kim
2014-04-14 11:12 ` f2fs: BUG_ON() is triggered when mount valid f2fs filesystem Andrey Tsyvarev
2014-04-15 11:04   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2014-04-16  9:11     ` Andrey Tsyvarev
2014-04-16 23:35       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2014-04-17  1:11         ` Alexey Khoroshilov [this message]
2014-04-17  7:45           ` Jaegeuk Kim
2014-04-18  6:04             ` Alexey Khoroshilov
2014-04-18  6:35               ` Jaegeuk Kim
2014-04-18  6:40               ` Gu Zheng
2014-07-21 10:56   ` f2fs: Possible use-after-free when umount filesystem Andrey Tsyvarev
2014-07-22  2:17     ` Gu Zheng
2014-07-22 10:04       ` Andrey Tsyvarev
2014-07-23  2:12         ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2014-07-23  3:39           ` Gu Zheng
2014-07-24 10:14             ` Andrey Tsyvarev
2014-07-25  3:22               ` Chao Yu
2014-07-25  5:49                 ` Gu Zheng
2014-07-25 15:37                   ` Jaegeuk Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=534F2A32.9030405@ispras.ru \
    --to=khoroshilov@ispras.ru \
    --cc=jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tsyvarev@ispras.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox