[PATCH] Fixed spelling errors within comments

[PATCH] Fixed spelling errors within comments

[Terence Eden]

From: Terence Eden <github.com@shkspr.mobi>

This is my first patch submission. Please let me know if I have made a mistake anywhere.

Signed-off-by: Terence Eden <github.com@shkspr.mobi>
---
 arch/arc/kernel/entry.S |   12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arc/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arc/kernel/entry.S
index 819dd5f..38ef91a 100644
--- a/arch/arc/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/arc/kernel/entry.S
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ ARCFP_DATA int1_saved_reg
 int1_saved_reg:
 	.zero 4
 
-/* Each Interrupt level needs it's own scratch */
+/* Each Interrupt level needs its own scratch */
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARC_COMPACT_IRQ_LEVELS
 
 ARCFP_DATA int2_saved_reg
@@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ trap_with_param:
 	lr  r0, [efa]
 	mov r1, sp
 
-	; Now that we have read EFA, its safe to do "fake" rtie
+	; Now that we have read EFA, it is safe to do "fake" rtie
 	;   and get out of CPU exception mode
 	FAKE_RET_FROM_EXCPN r11
 
@@ -676,9 +676,9 @@ not_exception:
 	brne r9, event_IRQ2, 149f
 
 	;------------------------------------------------------------------
-	; if L2 IRQ interrupted a L1 ISR,  we'd disbaled preemption earlier
-	; so that sched doesnt move to new task, causing L1 to be delayed
-	; undeterministically. Now that we've achieved that, lets reset
+	; if L2 IRQ interrupted a L1 ISR,  we'd disabled preemption earlier
+	; so that sched doesn't move to new task, causing L1 to be delayed
+	; undeterministically. Now that we've achieved that, let's reset
 	; things to what they were, before returning from L2 context
 	;----------------------------------------------------------------
 
@@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ ENTRY(ret_from_fork)
 	; put last task in scheduler queue
 	bl   @schedule_tail
 
-	; If kernel thread, jump to it's entry-point
+	; If kernel thread, jump to its entry-point
 	ld   r9, [sp, PT_status32]
 	brne r9, 0, 1f
 
-- 
1.7.9.5

Re: [PATCH] Fixed spelling errors within comments

[Randy Dunlap]

On 04/20/2014 05:33 AM, Terence Eden wrote:
> From: Terence Eden <github.com@shkspr.mobi>
> 
> This is my first patch submission. Please let me know if I have made a mistake anywhere.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Terence Eden <github.com@shkspr.mobi>

trivial's email address is trivial@kernel.org (cc-ed).

> ---
>  arch/arc/kernel/entry.S |   12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arc/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arc/kernel/entry.S
> index 819dd5f..38ef91a 100644
> --- a/arch/arc/kernel/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arc/kernel/entry.S
> @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ ARCFP_DATA int1_saved_reg
>  int1_saved_reg:
>  	.zero 4
>  
> -/* Each Interrupt level needs it's own scratch */
> +/* Each Interrupt level needs its own scratch */
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARC_COMPACT_IRQ_LEVELS
>  
>  ARCFP_DATA int2_saved_reg
> @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ trap_with_param:
>  	lr  r0, [efa]
>  	mov r1, sp
>  
> -	; Now that we have read EFA, its safe to do "fake" rtie
> +	; Now that we have read EFA, it is safe to do "fake" rtie
>  	;   and get out of CPU exception mode
>  	FAKE_RET_FROM_EXCPN r11
>  
> @@ -676,9 +676,9 @@ not_exception:
>  	brne r9, event_IRQ2, 149f
>  
>  	;------------------------------------------------------------------
> -	; if L2 IRQ interrupted a L1 ISR,  we'd disbaled preemption earlier
> -	; so that sched doesnt move to new task, causing L1 to be delayed
> -	; undeterministically. Now that we've achieved that, lets reset
> +	; if L2 IRQ interrupted a L1 ISR,  we'd disabled preemption earlier

I would write:                  an L1 ISR,

anyway:
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>


> +	; so that sched doesn't move to new task, causing L1 to be delayed
> +	; undeterministically. Now that we've achieved that, let's reset
>  	; things to what they were, before returning from L2 context
>  	;----------------------------------------------------------------
>  
> @@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ ENTRY(ret_from_fork)
>  	; put last task in scheduler queue
>  	bl   @schedule_tail
>  
> -	; If kernel thread, jump to it's entry-point
> +	; If kernel thread, jump to its entry-point
>  	ld   r9, [sp, PT_status32]
>  	brne r9, 0, 1f
>  
> 


-- 
~Randy

Re: [PATCH] Fixed spelling errors within comments

[Vineet Gupta]

Hi Terence,

Thanks for the fixes.

On Sunday 20 April 2014 10:30 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 04/20/2014 05:33 AM, Terence Eden wrote:
>> > From: Terence Eden <github.com@shkspr.mobi>
>> > 
>> > This is my first patch submission. Please let me know if I have made a mistake anywhere.
>> > 
>> ...
> I would write:                  an L1 ISR,
>
> anyway:
> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>

Applied to ARC for-next with Randy's ACK.

-Vineet