From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: comment in x86-opcode-map.txt on CALLW discrepancy between Intel and AMD
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 07:08:13 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5354454D.3070609@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1397828095-5356-1-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com>
(2014/04/18 22:34), Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> In 64-bit mode, AMD and Intel CPUs treat 0x66 prefix before branch
> insns differently. For near branches, it affects decode too since
> immediate offset's width is different.
>
> Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Thank you!
> CC: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
> CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt b/arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt
> index 1a2be7c..816488c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt
> +++ b/arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt
> @@ -273,6 +273,9 @@ dd: ESC
> de: ESC
> df: ESC
> # 0xe0 - 0xef
> +# Note: "forced64" is Intel CPU behavior: they ignore 0x66 prefix
> +# in 64-bit mode. AMD CPUs accept 0x66 prefix, it causes RIP truncation
> +# to 16 bits. In 32-bit mode, 0x66 is accepted by both Intel and AMD.
> e0: LOOPNE/LOOPNZ Jb (f64)
> e1: LOOPE/LOOPZ Jb (f64)
> e2: LOOP Jb (f64)
> @@ -281,6 +284,10 @@ e4: IN AL,Ib
> e5: IN eAX,Ib
> e6: OUT Ib,AL
> e7: OUT Ib,eAX
> +# With 0x66 prefix in 64-bit mode, for AMD CPUs immediate offset
> +# in "near" jumps and calls is 16-bit. For CALL,
> +# push of return address is 16-bit wide, RSP is decremented by 2
> +# but is not truncated to 16 bits, unlike RIP.
> e8: CALL Jz (f64)
> e9: JMP-near Jz (f64)
> ea: JMP-far Ap (i64)
> @@ -456,6 +463,7 @@ AVXcode: 1
> 7e: movd/q Ey,Pd | vmovd/q Ey,Vy (66),(v1) | vmovq Vq,Wq (F3),(v1)
> 7f: movq Qq,Pq | vmovdqa Wx,Vx (66) | vmovdqu Wx,Vx (F3)
> # 0x0f 0x80-0x8f
> +# Note: "forced64" is Intel CPU behavior (see comment about CALL insn).
> 80: JO Jz (f64)
> 81: JNO Jz (f64)
> 82: JB/JC/JNAE Jz (f64)
> @@ -842,6 +850,7 @@ EndTable
> GrpTable: Grp5
> 0: INC Ev
> 1: DEC Ev
> +# Note: "forced64" is Intel CPU behavior (see comment about CALL insn).
> 2: CALLN Ev (f64)
> 3: CALLF Ep
> 4: JMPN Ev (f64)
>
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-20 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-18 13:34 [PATCH] x86: comment in x86-opcode-map.txt on CALLW discrepancy between Intel and AMD Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-20 22:08 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5354454D.3070609@hitachi.com \
--to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox