public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	<paulus@samba.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <acme@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf-event/cgroup: explicitly init the early_init field
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:31:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53563709.2000408@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHz2CGW0D6GpbP7Tps2KoN8av_OUEzO9xGvpV_XwoHgFQ36sOw@mail.gmail.com>

On 2014/4/22 15:12, Jianyu Zhan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>> How can that field ever be nonzero?
>>
>> I.e. under what exact circumstances does this patch make sense?
> 
> Hi, Ingo,
> 
> More explanation.
> 
> Sure, for this global variable struct, if not initailized, its all
> fields will be initialized
> to 0 or null(depending on its type).  The point here is no to deprive
> the rights of compiler/linker of doing this initialization, it is mainly for
> documentation reason. Actually this field's value would affect how ->css_alloc
> should implemented.
> 
> Concretely, if early_init is nonzero, then ->css_alloc *must not* call kzalloc,
> because in cgroup implementation, ->css_alloc will be called earlier before
> mm_init().
> 
> I don't think that the value of one field(early_init) has a so subtle
> restrition on the another field(css_alloc) is a good thing,
> but since
> it is there,
> docment it should be needed.
> 
> I could resend the patch with  more comment.
> 

nack

As I said in another mail thread, this change makes no sense.


      reply	other threads:[~2014-04-22  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-22  5:28 [PATCH] perf-event/cgroup: explicitly init the early_init field Jianyu Zhan
2014-04-22  6:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-04-22  6:42   ` Jianyu Zhan
2014-04-22  7:12   ` Jianyu Zhan
2014-04-22  9:31     ` Li Zefan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53563709.2000408@huawei.com \
    --to=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nasa4836@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox