From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
<paulus@samba.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <acme@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf-event/cgroup: explicitly init the early_init field
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:31:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53563709.2000408@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHz2CGW0D6GpbP7Tps2KoN8av_OUEzO9xGvpV_XwoHgFQ36sOw@mail.gmail.com>
On 2014/4/22 15:12, Jianyu Zhan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>> How can that field ever be nonzero?
>>
>> I.e. under what exact circumstances does this patch make sense?
>
> Hi, Ingo,
>
> More explanation.
>
> Sure, for this global variable struct, if not initailized, its all
> fields will be initialized
> to 0 or null(depending on its type). The point here is no to deprive
> the rights of compiler/linker of doing this initialization, it is mainly for
> documentation reason. Actually this field's value would affect how ->css_alloc
> should implemented.
>
> Concretely, if early_init is nonzero, then ->css_alloc *must not* call kzalloc,
> because in cgroup implementation, ->css_alloc will be called earlier before
> mm_init().
>
> I don't think that the value of one field(early_init) has a so subtle
> restrition on the another field(css_alloc) is a good thing,
> but since
> it is there,
> docment it should be needed.
>
> I could resend the patch with more comment.
>
nack
As I said in another mail thread, this change makes no sense.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-22 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-22 5:28 [PATCH] perf-event/cgroup: explicitly init the early_init field Jianyu Zhan
2014-04-22 6:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-04-22 6:42 ` Jianyu Zhan
2014-04-22 7:12 ` Jianyu Zhan
2014-04-22 9:31 ` Li Zefan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53563709.2000408@huawei.com \
--to=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nasa4836@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox