From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
stable@kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: commit 0bf1457f0cfca7b " mm: vmscan: do not swap anon pages just because free+file is low" causes heavy performance regression on paging
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:57:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53565922.1050709@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53564AA9.3060905@de.ibm.com>
On 22/04/14 12:55, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> While preparing/testing some KVM on s390 patches for the next merge window (target is kvm/next which is based on 3.15-rc1) I faced a very severe performance hickup on guest paging (all anonymous memory).
>
> All memory bound guests are in "D" state now and the system is barely unusable.
>
> Reverting commit 0bf1457f0cfca7bc026a82323ad34bcf58ad035d
> "mm: vmscan: do not swap anon pages just because free+file is low" makes the problem go away.
>
> According to /proc/vmstat the system is now in direct reclaim almost all the time for every page fault (more than 10x more direct reclaims than kswap reclaims)
> With the patch being reverted everything is fine again.
>
> Any ideas?
Here is an idea to tackle my problem and the original problem:
reverting 0bf1457f0cfca7bc026a82323ad34bcf58ad035d + checking against low, also seems to make my system usable.
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1923,7 +1923,7 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc,
*/
if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
free = zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES);
- if (unlikely(file + free <= high_wmark_pages(zone))) {
+ if (unlikely(file + free <= low_wmark_pages(zone))) {
scan_balance = SCAN_ANON;
goto out;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-22 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-22 10:55 commit 0bf1457f0cfca7b " mm: vmscan: do not swap anon pages just because free+file is low" causes heavy performance regression on paging Christian Borntraeger
2014-04-22 11:57 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2014-04-22 14:40 ` Rik van Riel
2014-04-22 14:53 ` Rafael Aquini
2014-04-24 12:24 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-04-22 15:06 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-04-22 18:33 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-04-22 18:58 ` Rafael Aquini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53565922.1050709@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aquini@redhat.com \
--cc=ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=suleiman@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox