From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-cgroup: explicitly init the early_init field
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:15:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5356DC0D.7090305@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHz2CGXcTZZHYK1WbOcF3S-O74dxE+yN9z527KhgOOEcfD_-DQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/22/2014 08:18 AM, Jianyu Zhan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>> The rest of the members will be zero-filled by default, so your patch should
>> not change anything.
>
> Hi, Jens
>
> I'm sorry I should have made this more clear.
>
> Sure, for this global variable struct, if not initailized, its all
> fields will be initialized
> to 0 or null(depending on its type). The point here is no to deprive
> the rights of compiler/linker of doing this initialization, it is mainly for
> documentation reason. Actually this field's value would affect how ->css_alloc
> should implemented.
>
> Concretely, if early_init is nonzero, then ->css_alloc *must not* call kzalloc,
> because in cgroup implementation, ->css_alloc will be called earlier before
> mm_init().
>
> I don't think that the value of one field(early_init) has a so subtle
> restrition on the another field(css_alloc) is a good thing, but since
> it is there, docment it should be needed.
Then just add the comment instead. The fact the members following the
last " = something," are zeroed is a common theme in the kernel, if you
just add a patch that blindly (and unnecessarily) zeroes one other
member, somebody else will likely find that odd and remove it again.
To be honest, I don't see much of a need to do anything here, really.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-22 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-22 5:26 [PATCH] blk-cgroup: explicitly init the early_init field Jianyu Zhan
2014-04-22 14:16 ` Jens Axboe
2014-04-22 14:18 ` Jianyu Zhan
2014-04-22 21:15 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5356DC0D.7090305@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nasa4836@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox