public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
Cc: Antony Suter <antony@mira.net>,
	List Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Allen Unueco <allen@premierweb.com>
Subject: Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in 2.4.0 go?
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 11:42:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5358.979213344@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11540.979193123@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <11540.979193123@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com>


kaos@ocs.com.au said:
>  And what a pile of crud those patches are!!  Instead of using the
> clean replacement interface for get_module_symbol, nvidia/
> patch-2.4.0-PR hard codes the old get_module_symbol algorithm as
> inline code.

Taking away get_module_symbol() and providing a replacement which has link 
order problems wasn't really very sensible.

You've changed a lookup in a static table built at compile time to a lookup 
in a dynamic table which has to be built in the right order at runtime.

It's too late to do the sensible thing and deprecate the old version rather 
than having a 'flag day'. But can we at least fix the link order crap?

struct static_inter_module_entry {
	const char *im_name;
	const void *userdata;
};

#define inter_module_register_static(x,y) \
 static struct static_inter_module_entry __ime_##x \
	__attribute__((unused,__section__(".intermodule")) \
	= { #x, y };

.. and the obvious for looking in that table in inter_module_get().


--
dwmw2


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2001-01-11 11:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-01-10  3:27 Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in 2.4.0 go? Allen Unueco
2001-01-10  3:50 ` Keith Owens
2001-01-11  5:38 ` Antony Suter
2001-01-11  6:05   ` Keith Owens
2001-01-11 11:42     ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2001-01-11 12:12       ` Keith Owens
2001-01-11 12:32         ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-11 12:46           ` Keith Owens
2001-01-11 13:09             ` Alan Cox
2001-01-11 13:14               ` Keith Owens
2001-01-12  2:12                 ` Ingo Oeser
2001-01-12  2:30                   ` Keith Owens
2001-01-12 10:27                     ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-12 11:55                       ` Keith Owens
2001-01-12 13:40                         ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-12 12:01                     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-01-12 12:18                       ` Keith Owens
2001-01-14 10:16                         ` Kai Henningsen
2001-01-11 13:25             ` David Woodhouse
     [not found] <3A5EFC56.F1A5BCE0@mira.net>
2001-01-12 19:11 ` Christian Zander
2001-01-13  1:11   ` Keith Owens
2001-01-13 10:46     ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-13 12:06       ` Keith Owens
2001-01-13 15:09         ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-13 19:03           ` Russell King
2001-01-14  0:21           ` Keith Owens
2001-01-14  9:43             ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-14 10:05               ` Keith Owens
2001-01-14 10:45                 ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-14  4:04           ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-14 17:46             ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-14 19:12               ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-14 20:02                 ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-14 20:15                   ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-14 21:15                     ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-14 21:47                       ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-14 21:57                         ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-14 23:00                         ` Keith Owens
2001-01-15  9:09                           ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-13 11:46     ` Christian Zander
2001-01-13 12:23       ` Keith Owens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5358.979213344@redhat.com \
    --to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=allen@premierweb.com \
    --cc=antony@mira.net \
    --cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox