[PATCH 3.4 03/27] net: unix: non blocking recvmsg() should not return -EINTR

Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-04-24T22:14:38Z

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

[ Upstream commit de1443916791d75fdd26becb116898277bb0273f ]

Some applications didn't expect recvmsg() on a non blocking socket
could return -EINTR. This possibility was added as a side effect
of commit b3ca9b02b00704 ("net: fix multithreaded signal handling in
unix recv routines").

To hit this bug, you need to be a bit unlucky, as the u->readlock
mutex is usually held for very small periods.

Fixes: b3ca9b02b00704 ("net: fix multithreaded signal handling in unix recv routines")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/unix/af_unix.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -1787,8 +1787,11 @@ static int unix_dgram_recvmsg(struct kio
goto out;

err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&u->readlock);
- if (err) {
- err = sock_intr_errno(sock_rcvtimeo(sk, noblock));
+ if (unlikely(err)) {
+ /* recvmsg() in non blocking mode is supposed to return -EAGAIN
+ * sk_rcvtimeo is not honored by mutex_lock_interruptible()
+ */
+ err = noblock ? -EAGAIN : -ERESTARTSYS;
goto out;
}

@@ -1910,6 +1913,7 @@ static int unix_stream_recvmsg(struct ki
struct unix_sock *u = unix_sk(sk);
struct sockaddr_un *sunaddr = msg->msg_name;
int copied = 0;
+ int noblock = flags & MSG_DONTWAIT;
int check_creds = 0;
int target;
int err = 0;
@@ -1925,7 +1929,7 @@ static int unix_stream_recvmsg(struct ki
goto out;

target = sock_rcvlowat(sk, flags&MSG_WAITALL, size);
- timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags&MSG_DONTWAIT);
+ timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, noblock);

/* Lock the socket to prevent queue disordering
* while sleeps in memcpy_tomsg
@@ -1937,8 +1941,11 @@ static int unix_stream_recvmsg(struct ki
}

err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&u->readlock);
- if (err) {
- err = sock_intr_errno(timeo);
+ if (unlikely(err)) {
+ /* recvmsg() in non blocking mode is supposed to return -EAGAIN
+ * sk_rcvtimeo is not honored by mutex_lock_interruptible()
+ */
+ err = noblock ? -EAGAIN : -ERESTARTSYS;
goto out;
}