From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"rtc-linux@googlegroups.com" <rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] ARM: rtc: update CMOS RTC to support MMIO and private lock
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 13:32:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <535A55F7.8030506@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140425102732.GI26756@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Hi Russell,
On 25/04/14 11:27, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:31:14AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> So far, the CMOS RTC (PC-style mc146818) has always been used
>> through an ISA I/O port of some sort, with each platform configuring
>> the address in a static way.
>>
>> Some platforms (KVM with kvmtools, for example) offer a MMIO version
>> of the CMOS RTC, which requires a different access method.
>>
>> This patch select the RTC_DRV_CMOS_MMIO configuration in order to
>> support MMIO accesses as well as the older IO port method.
>>
>> While we're at it, switch to RTC_DRV_CMOS_PRIV_LOCK and remove the
>> ancient rtc_lock.
>
> rtc_lock is there so that if you build the RTC driver and nvram driver
> in, and load them, they will both want to access the RTC via its
> indexed registers, and they need to share the lock to avoid trampling
> on each others toes.
Ah, I completely missed that one. Note to self: never look at that kind
of code just after lunch...
> Yes, it should be handled in a more modern way, but I don't think you
> can simply get rid of this in this manner. We can have both these
> drivers loaded on ARM platforms.
Agreed. I suppose that would have to be handled by some kind of module
dependency, but it is starting to look even uglier than I initially thought.
Back to the drawing board...
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-25 12:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-25 9:31 [PATCH 0/7] rtc-cmos: private locking and MMIO support Marc Zyngier
2014-04-25 9:31 ` [PATCH 1/7] rtc-cmos: abstract IO accessors Marc Zyngier
2014-04-25 9:31 ` [PATCH 2/7] rtc-cmos: abstract locking primitives Marc Zyngier
2014-04-25 9:31 ` [PATCH 3/7] rtc-cmos: allow MMIO to be used when initialized from FDT Marc Zyngier
2014-04-25 9:31 ` [PATCH 4/7] rtc-cmos: allow strictly MMIO based configurations Marc Zyngier
2014-04-25 9:31 ` [PATCH 5/7] rtc-cmos: implement driver private locking Marc Zyngier
2014-04-25 9:31 ` [PATCH 6/7] ARM: rtc: update CMOS RTC to support MMIO and private lock Marc Zyngier
2014-04-25 10:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-25 12:32 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2014-04-25 9:31 ` [PATCH 7/7] arm64: rtc: plug the PC CMOS RTC using MMIO accessors Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=535A55F7.8030506@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox