From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756488AbaD1O55 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:57:57 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f42.google.com ([209.85.160.42]:55642 "EHLO mail-pb0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756374AbaD1O5w (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:57:52 -0400 Message-ID: <535E6C6D.7080901@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 08:57:49 -0600 From: David Ahern User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Namhyung Kim , Jiri Olsa CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Corey Ashford , Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar , Paul Mackerras , Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jean Pihet Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf tools: Cache dso data file descriptor References: <1397756352-26694-1-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> <1397756352-26694-3-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> <1398609395.1689.17.camel@leonhard> <20140428100133.GE1109@krava.brq.redhat.com> <1398690994.1724.13.camel@leonhard> In-Reply-To: <1398690994.1724.13.camel@leonhard> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/28/14, 7:16 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote: > 2014-04-28 (월), 12:01 +0200, Jiri Olsa: >> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:36:35PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: >>> 2014-04-17 (목), 19:39 +0200, Jiri Olsa: >>>> Keeping the data file description open for the whole life >>>> of the dso object. >>> >>> I suspect there might be an issue for reporting very large data file >>> with this approach - like open file limit? >> >> I've got as high as ~200 openned file descriptors for >> ~2GB data of system wide monitoring >> >> but right that could be an issue.. I wonder we could >> workaround this somehow, because the speed up is quite >> noticable >> >> how about we monitor number of openned dso file descriptor >> and once we cross this we close some portion of them >> >> or something along those lines ;-) > > Yeah, we'll need some way to control those eventually. Handle EMFILE failures. Find an "old" one and close it to let the new one succeed. David