From: Marian Marinov <mm@1h.com>
To: containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
LXC development mailing-list
<lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: ioctl CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE is checked in the wrong namespace
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:49:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <535FADDA.2070803@1h.com> (raw)
Hello,
when using user namespaces I found a bug in the capability checks done by ioctl.
If someone tries to use chattr +i while in a different user namespace it will get the following:
ioctl(3, EXT2_IOC_SETFLAGS, 0x7fffa4fedacc) = -1 EPERM (Operation not permitted)
I'm proposing a fix to this, by replacing the capable(CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE) check with
ns_capable(current_cred()->user_ns, CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE).
If you agree I can send patches for all filesystems.
I'm proposing the following patch:
---
fs/ext4/ioctl.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ioctl.c b/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
index d011b69..25683d0 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ long ext4_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
* This test looks nicer. Thanks to Pauline Middelink
*/
if ((flags ^ oldflags) & (EXT4_APPEND_FL | EXT4_IMMUTABLE_FL)) {
- if (!capable(CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE))
+ if (!ns_capable(current_cred()->user_ns, CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE))
goto flags_out;
}
--
1.8.4
--
Marian Marinov
Founder & CEO of 1H Ltd.
Jabber/GTalk: hackman@jabber.org
ICQ: 7556201
Mobile: +359 886 660 270
next reply other threads:[~2014-04-29 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-29 13:49 Marian Marinov [this message]
2014-04-29 18:35 ` ioctl CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE is checked in the wrong namespace Theodore Ts'o
2014-04-29 18:52 ` Serge Hallyn
2014-04-29 21:49 ` Marian Marinov
2014-04-29 22:02 ` Serge Hallyn
2014-04-29 22:24 ` Marian Marinov
2014-04-29 22:29 ` Serge Hallyn
2014-04-29 22:45 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-29 23:06 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-04-29 23:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-29 23:20 ` Marian Marinov
2014-04-29 23:22 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-29 23:47 ` Stéphane Graber
2014-04-29 23:51 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-30 0:01 ` Stéphane Graber
2014-04-30 0:10 ` Marian Marinov
2014-04-30 0:12 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-30 0:11 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-30 0:21 ` Serge Hallyn
2014-04-30 0:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-30 0:44 ` Serge Hallyn
2014-04-30 1:03 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-30 0:16 ` Serge Hallyn
2014-04-30 0:32 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-04-30 0:33 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-30 0:40 ` Serge Hallyn
2014-04-30 7:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-04-30 13:33 ` Serge Hallyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=535FADDA.2070803@1h.com \
--to=mm@1h.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox