From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964903AbaD2Rbn (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:31:43 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:63845 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933921AbaD2Rbl (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:31:41 -0400 Message-ID: <535FE1DB.2060601@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:31:07 -0400 From: Rik van Riel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com CC: Randy Dunlap , Richard Weinberger , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com Subject: Re: mmotm 2014-04-24-13-07 uploaded References: <535AC91A.1070504@infradead.org> <535ACB0E.4070600@infradead.org> <20140427062650.GW4496@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140428135540.GA14661@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <535E8D14.7080405@infradead.org> <535E8E17.2050600@nod.at> <20140428200640.GG4430@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <535EBAE6.3080907@infradead.org> <20140428211535.GK4430@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <535F95FC.1020909@redhat.com> <20140429163604.GH8754@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20140429163604.GH8754@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/29/2014 12:36 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 08:07:24AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: >> On 04/28/2014 05:15 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 01:32:38PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>>> On 04/28/14 13:06, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >> >>>>> Please see below for a patch against next-20140428 that makes this build >>>>> for me. This is derived from Rik's patch, my patch, and is consistent with >>>>> Arnd's patch. >>>>> >>>>> Thanx, Paul >>>> >>>> Thnx, works for me. Finally. >>> >>> Good! >>> >>> Rik, how would you like to proceed with this? >> >> I guess this fix should go into -mm? > > Andrew dropped the original patch, so a consolidated patch is needed. > I believe that something like the following is what we ended up with. > Does this look right to you? That looks exactly like the one I have here :) Andrew, should I send you the two patches? -- All rights reversed