From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759896Ab0EDP76 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 May 2010 11:59:58 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51954 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759663Ab0EDP7z (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 May 2010 11:59:55 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20100504154601.GA20291@us.ibm.com> References: <20100504154601.GA20291@us.ibm.com> <20100504131610.2015.50934.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, keyrings@linux-nfs.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] KEYS: Fix RCU handling in key_gc_keyring() Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 16:58:23 +0100 Message-ID: <5363.1272988703@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > You're obviously being far too kind. In apparent trend for last night > I missed the lack of locking here. You pointed out the wrongness of it - it just wasn't in the way you thought. David