From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Convert timekeeping core to use printk_deferred (v2)
Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 13:25:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5367F39C.1050703@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140505144231.654d85b0@gandalf.local.home>
On 05/05/2014 11:42 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2 May 2014 16:05:36 -0700
> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>
>> Would "printk_deferred_once" be more logical than
>> "printk_once_deferred"? Think so. It's (((printk(deferred(once))),
>> not (((printk(once(deferred))).
>>
> I agree with the above, but other than that you can add my:
>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Thanks, will do!
>
> also, perhaps this series should include my patch:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/25/336
So this set applies ontop of -mm, which I believe includes your change.
If I try to cherry-pick your patch to include in my set, I think I have
to cherry-pick Jan's changes as well, so its probably just easier for
folks to grab -mm. :)
thanks
-john
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-05 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-02 22:09 [PATCH 0/4] Convert timekeeping core to use printk_deferred (v2) John Stultz
2014-05-02 22:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] printk: Re-add irqsave/restore in printk_sched John Stultz
2014-05-04 14:58 ` Jan Kara
2014-05-04 16:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-05 20:16 ` John Stultz
2014-05-02 22:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] printk: Rename printk_sched to printk_deferred John Stultz
2014-05-02 22:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] printk: Add printk_once_deferred John Stultz
2014-05-02 22:09 ` [PATCH 4/4] timekeeping: Use printk_deferred when holding timekeeping seqlock John Stultz
2014-05-02 23:05 ` [PATCH 0/4] Convert timekeeping core to use printk_deferred (v2) Andrew Morton
2014-05-05 15:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-05 18:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-05 20:25 ` John Stultz [this message]
2014-05-05 20:15 ` John Stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5367F39C.1050703@linaro.org \
--to=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jbohac@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).