From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] coretemp.0 folder contents changed
Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 06:32:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5368E45F.30301@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140506135558.3cafd062@endymion.delvare>
On 05/06/2014 04:55 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Guenter, Srinivas,
>
> On Mon, 5 May 2014 10:32:31 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 10:13:11AM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
>>> for kernel : 3.15.rc3 .
>>>
>>> Is there any change in the coretemp? Previously we used to see,
>>> tempx data (like temp2_input, temp2_max etc.)
>>> /sys/devices/platform/coretemp.0/.
>>
>> That isn't where you are supposed to look for hwmon attributes.
>
> Actually I used to recommend looking there when people were not using
> libsensors (e.g. for pwmconfig / fancontrol or custom scripts.) This
> path had the great merit of being stable across reboots, while hwmon
> class device numbers are not (or at least they aren't guaranteed to be.)
>
>> (...)
>> To give you the background, hwmon attributes are in the process of
>> being moved from the parent device to the hwmon device, or from
>> /sys/class/hwmon/hwmonX/device/ to /sys/class/hwmon/hwmonX/,
>> as part of an effort to streamline the code and make it more
>> consistent and maintainable.
>
> I am just realizing that we are also losing the stability of hardware
> device based paths with that move :( I suppose I shouldn't have
> bothered adding support for this to fancontrol.
>
> Don't get me wrong, I still believe this is the right move, but I fear
> that the question of persistent hwmon device names will resurface every
> now and then again. libsensors offers a solution but 1* it lacks
> support for pwm attributes and 2* it doesn't help with shell or perl
> scripts such as pwmconfig and fancontrol.
>
Can we implement a similar approach to network devices and make hwmon
path names (ie the /sys/class/hwmon/XXX path name) configurable via udev ?
Might be worth exploring.
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-06 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-05 17:13 coretemp.0 folder contents changed Srinivas Pandruvada
2014-05-05 17:32 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-05-05 17:46 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2014-05-06 11:55 ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2014-05-06 13:32 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2014-05-07 7:13 ` Jean Delvare
2014-05-07 12:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-05-09 7:57 ` Jean Delvare
2014-05-06 15:20 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2014-05-06 15:53 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2014-05-07 7:16 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5368E45F.30301@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox