From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753936AbaEGCr0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2014 22:47:26 -0400 Received: from mail.active-venture.com ([67.228.131.205]:52522 "EHLO mail.active-venture.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753448AbaEGCrZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2014 22:47:25 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 108.223.40.66 Message-ID: <53699EB1.6040007@roeck-us.net> Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 19:47:13 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomas Pop CC: "jdelvare@suse.de" , lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , johannes.winkelmann@sensirion.com Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2] hwmon: add support for Sensirion SHTC1 sensor References: <1398985530.17142.15.camel@ltli10.sensirion.lokal> <5362FDA9.8080300@roeck-us.net> <1399064369.3019.83.camel@ltli10.sensirion.lokal> <20140502231528.GA5157@roeck-us.net> <1399338214.24993.10.camel@ltli10.sensirion.lokal> <53683D38.7010904@roeck-us.net> <1399341707.24993.20.camel@ltli10.sensirion.lokal> <536853C0.8020406@roeck-us.net> <1399392184.3691.15.camel@ltli10.sensirion.lokal> In-Reply-To: <1399392184.3691.15.camel@ltli10.sensirion.lokal> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/06/2014 09:03 AM, Tomas Pop wrote: > Hi Gunter, > > Yes, that's exactly the idea - we would like to provide basic support > for a few low-cost boards as a starting point for anybody who is > interested in the sensor. Previously I was testing mostly on some > Android devices (kernel 3.4), and it seems, that a lot of thinks changed > in since version 3.4 :-) > > I will send in few days a tested version.. > Great. Unfortunately those chips are so small that they don't fit on my test boards, or I would have ordered some myself. I am looking forward to see those boards available for order somewhere ... hopefully at a lower price point than your evaluation boards ;-). Thanks, Guenter