public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@samsung.com>
To: Afzal Mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com>
Cc: linux@arm.linux.org.uk, open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM PORT" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: memset: zero out upper bytes in r1
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 18:40:31 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <536B975F.7070603@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <536B3946.9070106@samsung.com>

On 05/08/14 11:59, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> On 05/08/14 03:42, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
>>
>> int is to be converted to unsigned char in memset, would having above
>> change immediately upon entry to memset rather than at a place where it
>> won't always execute make intention clearer ? (although it doesn't make
>> difference)
>>
> 
> I think it's better to keep it near other manipulations with r1.
> Plus this will save us from executing extra instruction on 'memset -> 6 -> 5 -> return'
> path (memset for size <= 3).
> 
> 
>> ubfx r1, r1, #0, #8 would have given the needed typecasting, but seems
>> it is available only on ARMv6T2 & above.
>>
> 
> Indeed. It might be wrapped it with #if #else, but it will be a bit ugly,
> probably not worth to do.
> 
> 

Err, there is no reason to use ubfx, it just the same as and r1,r1, #0xff.
On ARMv6T2 & above one instruction could be saved by using BFI instead of ORR, like this:

diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/memset.S b/arch/arm/lib/memset.S
index 94b0650..9a7f714 100644
--- a/arch/arm/lib/memset.S
+++ b/arch/arm/lib/memset.S
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ ENTRY(memset)
 /*
  * we know that the pointer in ip is aligned to a word boundary.
  */
-1:     orr     r1, r1, r1, lsl #8
-       orr     r1, r1, r1, lsl #16
+1:     bfi     r1, r1, #8, #8
+       bfi     r1, r1, #16, #16
        mov     r3, r1
        cmp     r2, #16
        blt     4f


  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-08 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-05  7:11 [PATCH] arm: memset: zero out upper bytes in r1 Andrey Ryabinin
2014-05-07 23:42 ` Afzal Mohammed
2014-05-08  7:59   ` Andrey Ryabinin
2014-05-08 14:40     ` Andrey Ryabinin [this message]
2014-05-08  8:04 ` Vladimir Murzin
2014-05-08  8:38   ` Vladimir Murzin
2014-05-12  6:58     ` Andrey Ryabinin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=536B975F.7070603@samsung.com \
    --to=a.ryabinin@samsung.com \
    --cc=afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox